It would be nice to have a list of known and confirmed bugs that Symantec support knows with a plan to fix it and maybe voting system (like in ideas) that we may vote what should be fixed first.
With a bug there should be also ETA for a fix (in what release it will be fixed).
Sometimes there is a known problem and even whitepapers available but only for internal use and it would be handy to be able to seek and reference something when calling support (obviously I'm not expecting that some ...
Suggested: 11 Jun 2009 by pbogu | 55 comments - last comment 06 Dec 2013 by _Brian
Right now NBU is not having the mail notification facility, we have to configure BLAT for relay. I think NBU should either integrate the BLAT within its installable or develop new embedded mail notification tool.
Suggested: 03 Jun 2009 by Deepak W | 7 comments - last comment 23 Jan 2012 by FrSchind
In BE 2012, exclude dates are on a server level, i.e. they apply to all scheduled jobs. The inability to exclude dates for individual jobs is a serious set-back and would mean that we now CANNOT stop scheduled jobs from running during holidays.
Suppose I have JobA and JobB scheduled to start at 10 p.m. and 2 a.m. respectively. These are daily backup jobs and I do not want them to run on holidays because there is nobody in the office and no updates are done. If a holiday ...
Suggested: 09 Mar 2012 by pkh | 44 comments - last comment 10 Mar 2014 by CraigV
I would like to suggest an enhancement to the (windows) GUI for netbackup.
It would be nice if we could define arbitrarily-named groups so we can place policies into them. This is purely for display/grouping purposes.
We could then easily separate policies belonging to certain locations or created for a certain purpose (for example test or VCB or Exchange) so we do not need to scroll through hundreds of policies...
A variation/extension on this idea could be to have a 'view by policy', ...
Suggested: 05 Jan 2010 by stanleym | 8 comments - last comment 23 Oct 2013 by TTFO7.6
This has been mentioned before, probably in the previous incarnation of the NetBackup forum, but now we have 'Ideas', so:
"We do on occasion have the need to suspend NetBackup activity for particular clients (upgrade, maintenance etc etc) & it would be very useful to have the ability to suspend/deactivate scheduled backups on a per client basis. (Or even a per client/per policy basis if changes are being made to a particular area on a particular client).
Currently, our only or ...
This idea is for a tool to be created that can be run against a NetBackup deployment (master/media/clients) to check for Symantec best practices and make recommendations where necessary (items like number buffers/size buffers/media and master server resource utilization/clients or servers with old software versions). The tool could even be integrated into a product like NOM to run on a regular schedule and so that it could alert when items become out of compliance/best practice.
This requirement has arisen because I have independ disks on my VMWare VMs. My backups fail with an error that the independent disks cannot be backed up. I am aware of this and happy with it. So I want to be able to tell Backup Exec to ignore this error and mark my jobs as completed sucesfully.
See discussion here:
Suggested: 14 Mar 2011 by bn8959 | 3 comments - last comment 06 Jun 2013 by MCHAdmin
I would like to suggest adding a "global exclude list" feature to netbackup.
This should be a list that exists next to the current client-based exclude list and is ALWAYS used for every client and every policy.
Why is this useful? For example: our organisation has just started to roll-out SCOM2007 on all servers.
This produces a new list of files-in-use on every server (for example edb.log, edb.tmp, edbtmp.log etc).
Adding these files to the exclude list means editing the exclude ...