Benefits of Rdeploy over Ximage (WIM)
Updated: 11 Apr 2007 | 2 comments
The article on "Building a Standard Vista Image" said that "comparing the advantages and disadvantages of WIM versus traditional imaging formats is beyond the scope of this document". So here is a rundown of the major features of Ximage (WIM) vs. Rdeploy.
| Feature | Rdeploy | Ximage (WIM) |
|---|---|---|
| Supported Preboot Environments | WinPE, Linux, DOS | WinPE only |
| Multicasting | Yes | No |
| Can create partitions as needed | Yes | No |
| Heterogeneous | Yes (FAT, NTFS, EXT2, EXT3) | No (Windows Only) |
| File-based | Yes | Yes |
| Executable images | Yes | No |
| Sector-based | Yes | No |
| Offline Editing | Yes | Yes |
| Commandline | Over 40 Commands | 18 commands |
| Multiple WIM payloads with "single instancing" | No | Yes |
| Mount images as a directory | No | Yes |
| "Non-destructive" -- does not erase disk contents | No | Yes |
| Can mark images as bootable | No | Yes |
blog entry Filed Under:
The Endpoint Management Community Blog is the perfect place to share short, timely insights including product tips, news and other information relevant to the Endpoint Management community. Any authenticated Connect member can contribute to this blog.
Comments
Thanks for this additional
Thanks for this additional comment to the article on "Building a Standard Vista Image".
This comparison between two different solutions is really clear and useful to understand differences and advantages.
Regards
PM
Good article
This is a good article and is very usefull for selecting the right deploy method.
Regards
Erik
Regards Erik www.DinamiQs.com Dinamiqs is the home of VirtualStorm (www.virtualstorm.org)
*************************************************************
If your issue has been solved, Please mark it as solved
***********
Would you like to reply?
Login or Register to post your comment.