Video Screencast Help
Symantec to Separate Into Two Focused, Industry-Leading Technology Companies. Learn more.
Vision User Conference Blog

Most eDiscovery Costs Wasted on Extraneous Information.

Created: 13 Apr 2010 • Updated: 19 May 2014
BandL's picture
0 0 Votes
Login to vote

Most of the money spent on electronic discovery today is squandered on reviewing irrelevant documents, according to a white paper recently released by Forensics Consulting Solutions, of Phoenix, Ariz. According to the document authored by Mark G. Walker, Roland J. Bernier III and Barclay Blair, only about 10 percent of all Electronically Stored Information (ESI) collected has value for the purpose for which it was gathered. "Yet," the authors stated, "investigators spend 80 percent of their time and the associated cost on the 90 percent that has no value."

Organizations are spending millions of dollars finding, processing, reviewing, and producing digital information required in lawsuits, the paper said. It noted that one out of five organizations spends more than $10 million annually on litigation--and that doesn't include what's spent on settlements and judgment awards. That number is bound to grow, and with it the amount spent on e-discovery tools, which is expected to reach almost $5 billion by 2011. "It costs about 20 cents to buy 1GB of storage; however, it costs around $3500 to review that same GB of storage," the paper revealed.

While the expense of ediscovery comes from a number of places, it noted, the most significant is the cost of finding, processing and reviewing information that has been unnecessarily retained.

One way to reduce the extraneous information in an organization's information universe is to have a solid Information Governance (IG) plan. "The proactive nature of IG means that unnecessary information is disposed of as soon as it is no longer needed and all legal requirements for its retention and preservation have been satisfied," the paper explained.

"IG enables businesses to get rid of unnecessary information in a defensible manner," it continued. "As such, it can reduce the amount of information that needs to be reviewed in the course of a legal matter."

And while, I try to keep these blog posts in the realm of non-marketing, this article goes hand-in-hand with our Archived Data Manager (ADM) product, which can cut eDiscovery costs by as much as 50%.  ADM extracts, consolidates and centrally indexes all your enterprise backup information. All backup catalog information is now readily accessible through ADM's intuitive, Web-based interface.

The result is a reduction of the number of tapes that need to be indexed, making random and expensive eDiscovery searches as described above a thing of the past.