Video Screencast Help
Symantec to Separate Into Two Focused, Industry-Leading Technology Companies. Learn more.
Backup Exec

Unified Future?

Created: 15 Aug 2012 • Updated: 28 May 2014 • 4 comments
Drew Meyer's picture
+2 2 Votes
Login to vote

After two weeks on this job it's plain to see there are some major industry dynamics afoot.

The backup market is in a consolidation phase, as we've seen companies dedicated to addressing virtualized environments mature and get aquired. Dell picked up AppAsure, Quest aquired VizionCore and then BakBone (then Dell aquired Quest), Quantum grabbed Pancetera.

Industry analysts are pointing out that point products are not effective for long-term data management strategies. Just like in the storage industry, a unified architecture platform is the smarter play. NetApp's championship of NAS and SAN at the same time in the same box drove EMC to aquire and integrate for years to achieve a similar solution. Dell aquired Compellent (after losing 3PAR to HP) after great success with a point product from EqualLogic to address some of the same problems.

VMware and Hyper-V are transforming large and small environments and creating backup management challenges through mixed hypervisor and legacy archive and recovery requirements. Point products just don't complete the picture for an IT generalist and create risk and reliabilty questions. Customers tell us they require quality, performance and reliabilty in their backup products regardless of environment or media, and are steadily realizing that Backup Exec has a unified architecture that gracefully addresses this risk factor. 

So, we're all living through a cycle of new companies proliferating, maturing and consolidating. The Venture Capitalists love this; risk-averse IT managers may not be so thrilled. Are you choosing your strategy or is it choosing you? I suggest that a unifed architecture from an independent vendor is the smarter bet. 

Comments 4 CommentsJump to latest comment

Dushan Gomez's picture

Yes, that is correct, the future is unified, I just realized this since Oracle acquired SUN, so they try to do the same like IBM did many years back since IT wasn't called IT.

Therefore the number of big player in IT will be lesser and much more integrated Hardware and Software leaving us not much left to choose. So Open stack future is unknown.

Dushan Gomez
IT Manager
VCP 4 and 5 | MCITP Exchange Server | MCTS SharePoint Server | MCP Windows XP

+2
Login to vote
Drew Meyer's picture

Dushan, do you think a unified architecture for backup (spanning both physical and virtual machines) is important to IT generalists? Are point products introducing risk?

Director of Marketing, NetBackup
@DrewMeyerSYMC

+2
Login to vote
Dushan Gomez's picture

Drew, it depends on what is the security requirement and what the risks involved are ?

from my point of view yes, it should perform better as it integrates seamlessly with single point of support as well. For Example: Symantec now owns and fully support Netbackup & Puredisk

Dushan Gomez
IT Manager
VCP 4 and 5 | MCITP Exchange Server | MCTS SharePoint Server | MCP Windows XP

0
Login to vote
Drew Meyer's picture

Yes, I think you are getting my drift. One point of contact/mangement/licensing across legacy media, physical and virtual machines is simpler than multiple point products from different vendors.

For the purposes of this forum I'm talking about Backup Exec, but NBU and PureDisk is the same idea :)

We hope to see you at VMworld or Spiceworld - follow me (@backupexecdrew) or Matt Stephenson (@packmatt73) on Twitter for a chance to win some great stuff and attend special events!

Director of Marketing, NetBackup
@DrewMeyerSYMC

+1
Login to vote