Video Screencast Help
Search Video Help Close Back
to help
New in the Rewards Catalog: Vouchers for "Symantec Technical Specialist" and "Symantec Certified Specialist" exams.

CCS 9.0.1 Custom Checks

Updated: 21 May 2010 | 2 comments
samir.saadah's picture
0 0 Votes
Login to vote

Dear All,

is there any deference between /(S-1-15-19)|(S-1-15-20) and {S-1-15-19,S-1-15-20}

in the predefine Standard for Windows 2003 DC there is a check for (Replacing token) SIDs.

i try to create a custom check with the same configuration but i replace /(S-1-15-19) | (S-1-15-20)/ with {S-1-15-19,S-1-15-20) but it dos'nt work any suggested of how the format for the list

Best regards,
Samir

discussion Filed Under:

Comments

CT-219's picture
27
Oct
2009
0 Votes 0
Login to vote

Is there a reason you are not

Is there a reason you are not following the same format as that in the predefined standard? I have found that on complex checks, a failure to follow exactly the expected format will result in inconsistent and sometimes non-existent results. As it is really only 2 extra keystrokes for each GUID you want to query, you will save yourself a lot of hassle by following it as written.

samir.saadah's picture
02
Nov
2009
0 Votes 0
Login to vote

Dear, Thanks for your

Dear,

Thanks for your response, Can you please help is the symbolic "|" in the check means (OR) or (AND)

Thanks
Samir