CCS 9.0.1 Custom Checks
Updated: 21 May 2010 | 2 comments
Dear All,
is there any deference between /(S-1-15-19)|(S-1-15-20) and {S-1-15-19,S-1-15-20}
in the predefine Standard for Windows 2003 DC there is a check for (Replacing token) SIDs.
i try to create a custom check with the same configuration but i replace /(S-1-15-19) | (S-1-15-20)/ with {S-1-15-19,S-1-15-20) but it dos'nt work any suggested of how the format for the list
Best regards,
Samir
discussion Filed Under:
Comments
Is there a reason you are not
Is there a reason you are not following the same format as that in the predefined standard? I have found that on complex checks, a failure to follow exactly the expected format will result in inconsistent and sometimes non-existent results. As it is really only 2 extra keystrokes for each GUID you want to query, you will save yourself a lot of hassle by following it as written.
Dear, Thanks for your
Dear,
Thanks for your response, Can you please help is the symbolic "|" in the check means (OR) or (AND)
Thanks
Samir
Would you like to reply?
Login or Register to post your comment.