ServiceDesk

 View Only
  • 1.  Closing Out Incidents Not Needed

    Posted Mar 28, 2012 05:01 PM

    I am wondering how others handle closing an incident with numerous sub-tasks that is not needed or should be cancelled.  Do you contact each assignee and ask them to resolve the incident even though it is intended to be cancelled? 



  • 2.  RE: Closing Out Incidents Not Needed

    Posted Apr 05, 2012 03:04 PM

    Is there any easy way to cancel out tickets and sub-tasks without have to contact each person?



  • 3.  RE: Closing Out Incidents Not Needed

    Broadcom Employee
    Posted Apr 06, 2012 02:10 AM

    There is a workflow to (quick/mass) close incidents:
    Submit Request > ServiceDesk > Close Incidents

    If you use 'Quick Close' close code, there will be no communication to users/technicians.

    Note that this workflow only works for incidents that are valid/working and that are in some open status (i.e. it will not work with orphaned incidents or Resolved incidents).



  • 4.  RE: Closing Out Incidents Not Needed

    Posted Apr 09, 2012 02:07 PM

    Does this option close both the primary task and all sub-tasks regardless of who it is assigned too?



  • 5.  RE: Closing Out Incidents Not Needed
    Best Answer

    Broadcom Employee
    Posted Apr 10, 2012 04:35 AM

    You are right, it does not. It only closes one of the tasks when there are more than one subtask for the incident.

    Edit:
    If you are OK with modifying the workflows, try this:
    http://www.symantec.com/connect/blogs/how-modify-sdcloseincidents-work-subtasks



  • 6.  RE: Closing Out Incidents Not Needed

    Posted Apr 11, 2012 12:03 PM

    Thanks for the information.  This answers my question and gives me a direction to consider.