Protection Engine for Network Attached Storage

 View Only
  • 1.  Does it make sense to use Symantec Endpoint Protection AND SAV for NAS?

    Posted Sep 17, 2014 06:27 AM

    If we assume that all files located on a NAS are read/written through workstations only (no upload through web server for example), does it make sense to implement both Symantec Endpoint Protection on workstations AND SAV for NAS on NAS appliances in a single organization?



  • 2.  RE: Does it make sense to use Symantec Endpoint Protection AND SAV for NAS?

    Posted Sep 17, 2014 06:31 AM

    both are different solutions you need to have them together.

    SEP is for endpoint only

    SAV is for NAS..

    if there is a virus on NAS and no one is accessing that file, it can stay there happily for ever and do its job...

     



  • 3.  RE: Does it make sense to use Symantec Endpoint Protection AND SAV for NAS?

    Posted Sep 17, 2014 08:11 AM

    Hi Rafeeq,

    thanks for your answer.

    A remark: how a virus can be located on NAS if all files were previously scanned by workstation before being transfered to the NAS?



  • 4.  RE: Does it make sense to use Symantec Endpoint Protection AND SAV for NAS?
    Best Answer

    Posted Sep 17, 2014 08:46 AM

    It's possible there was no definitions at the time to detect it.

    It does make sense because you need something to scan the files on the user machines.

    Another option is to create a new box for scanning the NAS, use SEP and map to your NAS shares, create a custom scan in SEP to map those shares. Realise this is outside the scope of SEP but it can be done with SEP only.



  • 5.  RE: Does it make sense to use Symantec Endpoint Protection AND SAV for NAS?

    Posted Sep 17, 2014 09:21 AM

    Thanks Brian, it's clear now!



  • 6.  RE: Does it make sense to use Symantec Endpoint Protection AND SAV for NAS?

    Posted Sep 17, 2014 09:23 AM

    great :)