EV 8 API help
Updated: 22 May 2010 | 7 comments
This issue has been solved. See solution.
Our in-house developer wrote an app using the 6.0 API which had been running properly under EV 7 and even EV 8 but recently stopped working for reasons unknown. We tried running it on one of our EV servers that has EV8 and Win2k8 x64 and also on another EV8 server on Win2k3.
When he runs it from his WinXP machine with the 8.0 API it works but when running it from the EV server it complains about:
Retrieving the COM class factory for component with CLSID {E4BE20A4-9EF1-4B05-9117-AF43EAB4B295} failed due to the following error: 80040154.
We've went over the registry and can see that the dll exists which means it should be registered. Hoping someone might be able to help.
discussion Filed Under:
Comments
Maybe tell us a bit more,
Maybe tell us a bit more, what are you trying to do when it bombs out? can you post a snippit? can you get some trace from ev? have you added trace to your code?
--wayne
www.quadrotech-it.com - All your EV Tools
Have you tried 8 SP 2? I
Have you tried 8 SP 2? I know there were a few fixes for the ECM API ... They might be relevant.
Failing that then it's probably best like Wayne suggested, to post some snippet of code, and others can try it out on their environments and/or contact Support.
Hope that helps,
andrew, could you explain
andrew, could you explain what api functions the app uses? is it for user provisioning?
do you have an api license?
cheers
www.quadrotech-it.com - All your EV Tools | www.techfreak.ch
Thanks for all the questions.
Thanks for all the questions. Before I had a chance to gather info for you, our developer was able to get it to work by changing the platform type in the project from "any cpu" to x86.
Andy Becker | Authorized Symantec Consultant | Trace3 | Symantec Platinum Partner | www.trace3.com
Cool.. Maybe that is
Cool.. Maybe that is something which should go in the documentation for the API ? (Sorry I'm not really familiar with the stuff that goes out with the API.. but if it is a good idea, I can pass it on internally to get it added)
It sure wouldn't hurt to have
It sure wouldn't hurt to have it added to the documentation. Thanks Rob!
Andy Becker | Authorized Symantec Consultant | Trace3 | Symantec Platinum Partner | www.trace3.com
As all your internal stuff is
As all your internal stuff is x86 anyway, it might be a nice shot, yes.
www.quadrotech-it.com - All your EV Tools | www.techfreak.ch
Would you like to reply?
Login or Register to post your comment.