Groupmailbox with many delegates
Created: 05 Feb 2013 | Updated: 05 May 2013 | 3 comments
This issue has been solved. See solution.
Hello all,
I have an issue with a mailbox that has 206 delegates. On the archive (using permissionbrowser) I see many, but not all. This results in not all delegates having access to the archive of that groupmailbox.
I believe I have seen this before (ie a limit on the amount of delegates) but I cannot find related information. If anyone knows if there is a limit, please let me know.
I was thinking to create a group that has these 206 people in it, and then assigning the group the necessary delegation rights on the mailbox. As far as I know there are no caveats (as long as it is not a group in a group in a group), but I am not sure.
Delegating the group should work as far as I know. Can any of you confirm this?
Thanks,
Gertjan
Discussion Filed Under:
Comments 3 Comments • Jump to latest comment
gertjan, as i was reading your post the first thing that came to mind was why are there 206 individuals assigned permissions? that would be much more efficient using a group. so yes, i would recommend using a group. and if they dont want to change it from the mailbox side, you can easily add the group to the archive permissions.
Andy Becker | Authorized Symantec Consultant | Trace3 | Symantec National Partner | www.trace3.com
Andrew,
Don't get me started :-)
Good point on the group though. I'll check that.
Thank you, Gertjan, MCSE, MCITP,MCTS, SCS, STS
Company: www.t2.nl
www.quadrotech-it.com
www.symantec.com/vision
Would you like to reply?
Login or Register to post your comment.