Information on the CPU/Memory overhead of using SFWHA-DR versus native Windows
We are currenlty having a bake-off for Exchange 2010 of using SFWHA 6.0.1 or native a native Microsoft DAG for a COOP/DR solution at he customer site I support.
My question for Symatec would be if there is any documentation on the amount of extra overhead on each Exchange 2010 mailbox server when using SFWHA versus just the Windows 2008 operating system itself?
The plans are for:
6 Mail Servers
4 Databases per server
Windows 2008 R2 with each virtual server with 64 GB RAM
If there ae any planning guides from Symantec for Exchange 2010 using SFWHA that would be useful as well.
Thanks in advance,