Video Screencast Help
Search Video Help Close Back
to help
New in the Rewards Catalog: Vouchers for "Symantec Technical Specialist" and "Symantec Certified Specialist" exams.

NetBackup not backing up all files

Updated: 22 May 2010 | 15 comments
mangler108's picture
+1 1 Vote
Login to vote
This issue has been solved. See solution.

Like to start with...I'm desperate. Any help at all is appreciated.

I am running NetBackup 6.0 and I've come across a problem where every night NetBackup reports a successfull backup, but it doesn't seem to be true. I went to restore a file about a week ago, and found it wasn't there. NetBackup only listed about half the files.

My backup server is running Windows Server 2003, and the server being backed up is also running 2003. Nothing special about the client, just terabytes of word documents, excel, etc. I have plenty of space on tapes it's backing up to. I'm backing up to LTO3 tapes.

The part that worries me the most is, it has been reporting successful backups every night.
I checked the exclusions, nothing is listed other then the odd windows folder (which I tried to remove as well; no luck)
I've tried to completely remake the policy as well, again, no luck.

Any advice or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

discussion Filed Under:

Comments

Seth Bokelman's picture
19
May
2009
0 Votes 0
Login to vote

What backup selection are you

What backup selection are you using?  ALL_LOCAL_DRIVES?

mangler108's picture
19
May
2009
0 Votes 0
Login to vote

Initially, yes. Last night I

Initially, yes. Last night I changed it to the specific drive letters, but still no luck.

Stuart Green's picture
19
May
2009
2 Votes +2
Login to vote

Not excluding then based on something else

Assume this happens on a FULL backup. And on individual drives or folders. Same drives/folders/files everytime?

I would go straight to creating the <install_path>/netbackup/logs/bpbkar/ directory on the client and upping the VERBOSE level. In this log you should see more information about what has been chosen to be backed up or the work list, and if any what stuff to exclude/include.

After this I would check your clients configuration. Then check what the master server has down for that client attributes. See if anything out of the ordinary shows up there.

There is a old article that discusses using bpbkar and just dumping to a file the files it would backup. While not writing to any disk or tape device. This was for NB 4.5 however, could still work today.
You could try and recreate the command that NetBackup is using but send to null - on the client.

Here is the specific portion I mean:

This test will use just bpbkar writing to /dev/null (the bit bucket). Which eliminates the network portion of the
equation.

As far as bpdbm, he has to stop/restart NB for that to take effect... performance wise... you could run the bpbkar
to /dev/null on the Windows client to see whether the client or the network is the problem...

c:\Veritas\Netbackup\bin\bpbkar32 -nocont > NUL 2> (for Windows)

i.e. c:\Veritas\Netbackup\bin\bpbkar32 -nocont c:\ > NUL 2> temp.f

temp.f will contain all of the files that bpbkar has collected. This will grow considerably if there is a large file
system or directory structure you are testing with. PLEASE BE WARNED

Taken from eval.veritas.com/downloads/edu/instructor_articles_102002.pdf

As always have installed the latest Maintenance Pack for NB 6.0 or Update for NB 6.5

Tip: Get overview/document your NBU environment. Run 'nbsu' and review the output.

• If this provides help, please vote or mark appropriate solution.

Nicolai's picture
19
May
2009
2 Votes +2
Login to vote

Please remeber bpbkar_path_tr

Great post Stuart.

Let me add that the touch file bpbkar_path_tr will add even more information (like the processing of exclude files) to the bpbkar debug logfile.

How to set bpkar_path_tr : support.veritas.com/docs/267292

Regards

Nicolai

Assumption is the mother of all mess ups.

If this post solved you’re questions please send a gratitude by marking it as a solution.

 

CY's picture
19
May
2009
0 Votes 0
Login to vote

Are you missing files in Full backup?

Are you missing files in Full backup, or differential/incremental backup?

If it's the later, I'd suggest to check how NBU determined a file should be backed up or skip.  In other words, how does NetBackup determine that a file has been changed since last backup.

Open the Windows client's "Backup, Archive, and Restore" window, check the NetBackup Client Properties and see if you have "Perform incremental based on archive bit" selected (by default) or deselected.  Check this option if it was deselected.

Another consideration is about the files that missed backup - if you copied files from another computer, the new files retain the date timestamp of the originals. If the original date was before the last backup date on this client, the new files are not backed up until the next full backup.

mangler108's picture
20
May
2009
0 Votes 0
Login to vote

Stuart, great post. I will

Stuart, great post. I will try all that today and update as I learn more.

As for the other questions, I do a daily incremental and a weekly full...I'm missing files from both.

DavidParker's picture
20
May
2009
1 Vote -1
Login to vote

Are you sure that the files

Are you sure that the files were supposed to be backed up on the daily job?
Usually, if they do not get changed between runs, an incremental will not back them up (depending on what type of incremental you're using).

Also, I just discovered something similar on one of my clients (the incremental wasn't backing up files that had changed that day).
Check the Host Properties for the client, under Windows Client, Client Settings.
The section for Incrementals tells NBU how to tell if a file needs to be backed up.

In my case, I had enabled 'Use Change Journal in Incrementals' and discovered that that was what was preventing my backups from being correct.

$0.02

mangler108's picture
20
May
2009
2 Votes 0
Login to vote

If they haven't changed, they

If they haven't changed, they should still show up in the list when i go to restore them...

Stumpr's picture
21
May
2009
0 Votes 0
Login to vote

"If they haven't changed,

"If they haven't changed, they should still show up in the list when i go to restore them..."

Please explain this statement.

Bob Stump VERITAS - "Ain't it the truth?" Incorrigible punster -- Do not incorrige

dglee's picture
20
May
2009
0 Votes 0
Login to vote

Account permissions?

Have you checked permissions to make sure that the account you're using to run NBU has rights to the files/folders you're missing?  I had this same problem, and account permissions ended up being the culprit.

mangler108's picture
21
May
2009
0 Votes 0
Login to vote

Well, bad news. The

Well, bad news.

The increased logging told me nothing...infact, the skipped folders weren't even listed in the logging.

Dglee, I just switched the account it's using...I'll post the results later.

quebek's picture
21
May
2009
0 Votes 0
Login to vote

junction points?

Maybe this folders are separated devices which were mounted under this directories?
You know in windows now there is a possibility to mount LUN under a directory, it does not have to be a separate drive with assigned drive letter.
Please check this out, if this is true, than You need to select cross mount point in your policy, or explicit name these juction points in backup selection list.

Paul Levecque's picture
25
May
2009
0 Votes 0
Login to vote

DFS shares

Are these files part of a dfs share? If so, netbackup doesn't back them up.  I found this a while back and had to run a program to robocopy the files some place else so they could be backed up.

Just a thought!

mangler108's picture
26
May
2009
0 Votes 0
Login to vote

The problem was I was using

The problem was I was using time stamp instead of archive bit for the incrementals.

For some reason, not sure why, this also affected the full backup.

Thanks for everyones help/suggestions.

Gerald W. Gitau's picture
26
May
2009
0 Votes 0
Login to vote

Thanks for reporting back.

Thanks for reporting back. This will help in future.