Video Screencast Help
Search Video Help Close Back
to help
New in the Rewards Catalog: Vouchers for "Symantec Technical Specialist" and "Symantec Certified Specialist" exams.

PD 6.6, PDDO, bad dedupe, bad cache hits, slow backups

Updated: 07 Jul 2010 | 4 comments
taso_stock's picture
0 0 Votes
Login to vote

Hi,

we had a for the most part well working NBU system with a NBU 6.5.3 master/media server on Linux, a NBU 6.5.3 media server on Linux and two NBU PureDisk 6.5.1 systems. Usually, all the NBU clients on this system are backing up their data through the PDDO on the media server to the first PureDisk device in the first stage. On the second stage, there is a duplication running to a second PureDisk device (directly between the two SPA ). We are using storage lifecycle policies (SLP) for that.

Some days ago, we updated the whole system and are now on NBU 6.5.4, PDDO 6.6 and PD 6.6.

After the update, all the jobs with smaller than 50GB in size were working, but we saw bad performance, bad dedupe and bad cache hits, not only on the first jobs after the update. It is still happening.

All jobs with 50GB in size or greater failed, but this could be solved meanwhile by changing maximum fragment size on the PureDisk STU to a value that is lower than the value in pd.conf (MAX_IMG_MBSIZE) on the PDDO!MAX_IMG_MBSIZE is remarked by default, which means, it's on 50.000 (MBytes).
So, we set the maximum fragment size on the PureDisk STU to 48 GBytes = 49.152 MBytes.

The current problem is:
All the Backup jobs are still taking around 40% longer and the dedupe rate has gone down from > 90% to around 30...70%.
Because of the bad dedupe, too much backup storage on the PureDisk is used.

Anyone here, who had similar problems and found a solution?

Matthias

discussion Filed Under:

Comments

teiva-boy's picture
30
Nov
2009
0 Votes 0
Login to vote

You've called support about

You've called support about this right?

There is an online portal, save yourself the long hold times. Create ticket online, then call in with ticket # in hand :-) http://mysupport.symantec.com "We backup data to restore, we don't backup data just to back it up."

taso_stock's picture
01
Dec
2009
0 Votes 0
Login to vote

Thank's for your reply. Yes,

Thank's for your reply.
Yes, Symantec support is involved.
But there are no solutions until today.
My hope was, someone else had similar problems and maybe an idea how to fix this....

Matthias

ElGringo's picture
22
Dec
2009
0 Votes 0
Login to vote

solve by EEB

This issues is kknown and can be solved by an EEB.
The support guy should give you this patch. I had similar issue...

Etrack 1853294: Back up speed for a PDDO backup that exceed 50 GB in size may degrade significantly. A PureDisk internal cache that is not properly refreshed causes this problem. This results in an elevated cache miss rate for all but the first backup fragment.

taso_stock's picture
06
Jan
2010
0 Votes 0
Login to vote

Solved by installation from scratch

there were not only backup speed issues. Also bad dedupe (maybe as a reason for the poor performance).
Etrack 1853294 is only speaking about performance problems.

Meanwhile I solved the problems by installing PureDisk 6.6 new from scratch.