Performance history
Updated: 05 Nov 2010 | 6 comments
Hi!
How should performance history work? (The one found in Actions -> Monitor -> Historical...)
Allmost all metrics are returning only "0".
But some, like "Memory, available MBytes" are showing correctly.
If I look at file C:\Program Files\Altiris\Altiris Agent\Monitor Agent\MetricLog.xml it seems to be ok. It has values but I can't get those results to Historical view.
Still, those same metric values does generate a warning about CPU load.. (I have another thread about this, becouse values that Monitor Agent gets about CPU load are nonsense...)
But why all those values are '0' in Historical view? Am I doing something wrong?
Regards,
Janne
Discussion Filed Under:
Comments
Some more info.. I think that
Some more info..
I think that realtime monitor can show metrics correctly (or, as they are send by Monitor Agent). But that information can not be read from historical side...
Possibly fixed in SMP 7.0 SP4 HF1
Hi Janne,
I suggest you to try the same with recently released SMP 7.0 SP4 HF1.
There was fixed issue which could resolve this problem as well.
Thanks,
Andrew.
Hi! I have upgraded to SMP
Hi!
I have upgraded to SMP 7.0 SP4 HF1, it did fix the problem that caused false alarms from CPU-metrics, but it did not fix this problem.
Does anyone have some info that where in database can I find these metric values? I could check if they are even written to database..
Regards,
Janne
Hi Janne, Metric data should
Hi Janne,
Metric data should be written to table MonitorMetricData of Symantec_CMDB database.
To understand whether this is a problem only with Historical Monitor or with getting historical data to database you can also check Monitor Reports (for example Processor Utilization report in Reports -> Monitoring and Alerting -> Monitor -> Servers -> Common Performance -> Processor folder in console).
Thanks,
Andrew.
Well, there is a LOT of data
Well, there is a LOT of data in MonitorMetricData table. So at least something is written there. :)
But, I tried those Monitor Reports, and they make no sense, on Processor Utilization report, there is either 0% or 100%, and that is not true :)
Any ideas that what could be causing this?
Regards,
Janne
Do you run the report for
Do you run the report for particular server or summary data for all servers? You can also drill down to the report by clicking to some line in the report. In the drill down you can see underlying data for the report. it may explain what is shown in the report.
Thanks,
Andrew.
Would you like to reply?
Login or Register to post your comment.