Messaging Gateway

 View Only
  • 1.  that ports used Brighmail gateway to update their signatures

    Posted Jan 12, 2010 02:21 PM
     that ports used Brighmail gateway to update their signatures

    Mi liveupdate no actualiza,y tengo activada la licencia Que puertos debo tener abiertos en el firewall?


  • 2.  RE: that ports used Brighmail gateway to update their signatures

    Posted Jan 12, 2010 02:22 PM
     My LiveUpdate does not update, and I activate the license
    What ports need to be opened in the firewall?


  • 3.  RE: that ports used Brighmail gateway to update their signatures

    Broadcom Employee
    Posted Jan 12, 2010 02:33 PM
    The following table illustrates the firewall ports and hostnames used by Symantec Brightmail products:
    HOSTNAME                             PROTOCOL    PORT
    swupdate.brightmail.com              TCP         443
    register.brightmail.com              TCP         443
    aztec.brightmail.com                 TCP         443
    liveupdate.symantec.com              TCP         80
    liveupdate.symantecliveupdate.com    TCP         80
    definitions.symantec.com             TCP         80

    Title: 'Firewall ports and hostnames used by Symantec Brightmail products'
    Document ID: 2009052217243854
    > Web URL: http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/ent-gate.nsf/docid/2009052217243854?Open&seg=ent

    For a more complete list, check out this PDF file on page 16:

    ftp://ftp.entsupport.symantec.com/pub/support/documentation/sbg_installation_guide.pdf



  • 4.  RE: that ports used Brighmail gateway to update their signatures

    Posted Jan 12, 2010 08:29 PM
    I added the ports in the firewall and still no update, there
    Anything else I should consider?


  • 5.  RE: that ports used Brighmail gateway to update their signatures

    Posted Jan 12, 2010 08:50 PM
    Are you seeing any errors in the logs?

    May be you are running into the JLU timeout issue mentioned in the following KB article:

    http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/ent-gate.nsf/docid/2009063013515654

    If this does not resolve your issue, you may want to look at a previous forum thread:

    http://www.symantec.com/connect/forums/sbg-803-cant-update-virus-definitions

    Regards,

    Adnan



  • 6.  RE: that ports used Brighmail gateway to update their signatures

    Posted Jan 12, 2010 09:10 PM
    I still do not update, I show log liveupdte

    Jan 12, 2010 7:56:59 PM The zip file downloaded is a catalog file
    Jan 12, 2010 7:56:59 PM Extracting liveupdt.tri
    Jan 12, 2010 7:56:59 PM Total number of bytes read is 531
    Jan 12, 2010 7:56:59 PM Extracting liveupdt.grd
    Jan 12, 2010 7:56:59 PM Total number of bytes read is 1,887
    Jan 12, 2010 7:56:59 PM Extracting liveupdt.sig
    Jan 12, 2010 7:56:59 PM Total number of bytes read is 2,267
    Jan 12, 2010 7:56:59 PM Unzipping completed
    Jan 12, 2010 7:56:59 PM Loading root certificate
    Jan 12, 2010 7:56:59 PM Setting certificate restrictions
    Jan 12, 2010 7:56:59 PM Loading guard file:  /tmp/jlu_downloads/1263347818137/sms$20for$20smtp$20avenge$20definitions$20for$20x86$2dredhat7.2_5.0_symalllanguages_livetri.zip1263347819067/liveupdt.grd
    Jan 12, 2010 7:56:59 PM Downloading 1263315729jtun_ennluapi.lin to /tmp/jlu_downloads/1263347818137/1263315729jtun_ennluapi.lin ...
    Jan 12, 2010 7:56:59 PM Connecting to 204.2.166.90 via HTTP ...
    Jan 12, 2010 7:56:59 PM Connected to 204.2.166.90 sending request ...
    Jan 12, 2010 7:56:59 PM Connecting to 204.2.166.90 via HTTP ...
    Jan 12, 2010 7:56:59 PM Connected to 204.2.166.90 sending request ...
    Jan 12, 2010 7:56:59 PM Waiting for response ...
    Jan 12, 2010 7:56:59 PM Waiting for response ...
    Jan 12, 2010 7:57:00 PM Receiving file ...


  • 7.  RE: that ports used Brighmail gateway to update their signatures

    Posted Jan 12, 2010 11:55 PM
    Have you already increased the timeout value?

    Do you see any errors in jlu-controller_log file?



  • 8.  RE: that ports used Brighmail gateway to update their signatures

    Posted Jan 13, 2010 06:53 PM
    I mark the following and I still get an update

    2010-01-13T15:30:00-06:00 (ERROR:3484.3072923328): [54008] The JLU process appears to be hanging and will be terminated.
    2010-01-13T15:50:00-06:00 (ERROR:3484.3072923328): [54008] The JLU process appears to be hanging and will be terminated.
    2010-01-13T16:10:00-06:00 (ERROR:3484.3072923328): [54008] The JLU process appears to be hanging and will be terminated.
    2010-01-13T16:30:00-06:00 (ERROR:3484.3072923328): [54008] The JLU process appears to be hanging and will be terminated.
    2010-01-13T16:50:00-06:00 (ERROR:3484.3072923328): [54008] The JLU process appears to be hanging and will be terminated.
    2010-01-13T17:10:00-06:00 (ERROR:3484.3072923328): [54008] The JLU process appears to be hanging and will be terminated.
    2010-01-13T17:30:00-06:00 (ERROR:3484.3072923328): [54008] The JLU process appears to be hanging and will be terminated.
    2010-01-13T17:50:00-06:00 (ERROR:3484.3072923328): [54008] The JLU process appears to be hanging and will be terminate


  • 9.  RE: that ports used Brighmail gateway to update their signatures

    Posted Jan 13, 2010 07:15 PM
    I see that you have increased the timeout to 20 minutes (from the default value of 10 minutes).  May be this is not enough depending on your connection speed.  You can increase this timeout to as high as 90 minutes.  I suggest trying a higher value to rule out that slow connection is the issue.

    If after trying this, you still can not get updates, then it is possible that you are running into another known issue described in the following KB:

    http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/ent-gate.nsf/docid/2009092508584054

    One other thing you can try before opening up a ticket with support is to switch to Rapid Response updates.

    Regards,

    Adnan


  • 10.  RE: that ports used Brighmail gateway to update their signatures

    Posted Feb 22, 2010 11:34 AM
    Hi mamartinez,

    Can you please update us on the resolution?

    Thanks

    Adnan