Endpoint Protection

 View Only
  • 1.  Possible to use a combination of user based and computer based policies?

    Posted Oct 07, 2009 10:53 PM
    I would like to have policies that apply to all computers, but allow them to be overridden when certain users log in.

    For example, I would like a policy applying to all computers that blocks usb drives.  However, if our one of our directors wants to log in and use a thumb drive I don't want the blocks to affect them. Is it possible to set policies for specific users that override the policies set on computers?

    I've searched and read a bit on this, and it doesn't sound like SEP can do what I want, but I'm not sure.  It doesn't quite make sense to me based on what I've read.

    Mainly, it just seems a lot easier to manage most things per computer, but a few select users need escalated rights no matter which computer they use.  Do we have to switch the entire SEP configuration to user mode in order to accomplish this?


  • 2.  RE: Possible to use a combination of user based and computer based policies?

    Posted Oct 07, 2009 11:12 PM
    Hi,

    Policies are always applied to groups. So you need to create a policy that allows USB to be accessible. Apply that policy to  agroup.

    Second part is to make sure that the clients are deployed in user mode. When a particular user logs in, the group will be changed automatically and a new policy will be applicable.

    Please take a look at the following discussions:

    https://www-secure.symantec.com/connect/forums/computer-mode-vs-user-mode

    https://www-secure.symantec.com/connect/forums/sep-client-switch-computer-mode-user-mode-automatically-and-moving-other-group

    Best,
    Aniket


  • 3.  RE: Possible to use a combination of user based and computer based policies?

    Posted Oct 08, 2009 12:18 AM
    Also wanted to point out that you can move clients from one group to another, so if you needed to move a client around for just a small amount of time you could move the client from the group with restricted access to a group with less restrictions. So it might also make sense to make a group for "Temporary access" for those situations where you might need to bump a user to have access for just a short amount of time.

    Cheers,
    Grant