Ghost Solution Suite

 View Only
  • 1.  Pushing out images with GSS 2.0 is very slow and kills the network.

    Posted Mar 31, 2008 01:38 PM
    I'm trying to push out an image of an Optiplex GX 260 which is linked at 100mbps with the switch linked back to the server at 1GB/s.  When I push out the image it settles in at 92 MB/min and never goes any faster.  On top of this it completly kills my network.  Are there any settings I could be overlooking?  Does it matter if you use Multi-cast, Uni-cast, or Directed Broadcast?  I can't seem to find the problem, so any suggestions would be appreciated.  Also, the NIC's are Intel Pro 1000 MT's.


  • 2.  RE: Pushing out images with GSS 2.0 is very slow and kills the network.

    Posted Mar 31, 2008 03:37 PM
    Try out unicast and see what the results are.  A coworked had a similar problem with multicast and then did unicast to reimage multiple workstations with much better results.


  • 3.  RE: Pushing out images with GSS 2.0 is very slow and kills the network.

    Posted Apr 01, 2008 05:42 AM
    That fixed the problem completly, thank you.  Before I've always left that to the default, so I've seen jobs run as multi-cast and uni-cast, but never noticed the correlation of when jobs were running faster.  Unbelievable, I went from only 92 mb/min with it killing my network to a rate in the 800's and no network issues.


  • 4.  RE: Pushing out images with GSS 2.0 is very slow and kills the network.

    Posted Apr 01, 2008 10:30 AM
    We're having this problem no matter which we choose!  We've tried multi-cast (doesn't work since it's not setup on our switches), Directed Broadcast, AND Unicast.... Any suggestions?  I don't mind the overtime, but my boss does!


  • 5.  RE: Pushing out images with GSS 2.0 is very slow and kills the network.

    Posted Apr 01, 2008 03:16 PM
    Not sure what problem you're having - swamping the network, or just plain "this transfer is slower than it should be" or both.  First offf, no unicast should swamp the network, kinda by definition.  I suppose you could check your interconnect - if it's a "hub" rather than a "switch", then the traffic on any port goes to all ports.  I don't know if you can get a hub in this day and age :) but if that's what you have, maybe that's why it's swamping the network.  Otherwise, as always, double-check your every single network equipment and configuration.  Sometimes, the "router over there" will do something to my "multicast over here".  I don't even know why the router got involved (all traffic on the same switch on the same subnet, doesn't need to route) but some stupid oddball setting on the router (and/or the switches in between) got involved.  Spanning tree, I'm told, can confuse things sometimes

    If the problem is merely "slower than I think it should be", then well - it could still be your network equipment, so always check that.  If you have a smart switch, and can set it for "cut-through" rather that "store-and-forward", that would help (a tiny bit.)   Check your drivers, and try using theUNDI/Universal driver to see if that changes things.  I've often found the Vendor (Dell, Gateway, etc) drivers are pretty bad, and I always go to the manufacturer of the NIC itself (they made it, nobody knows it better!)

    For now, since the problem exists in unicast, concentrate on that.  It's probably the easiest thing to fix, the fastest to determine what's going on.

    Good luck!
    PH



  • 6.  RE: Pushing out images with GSS 2.0 is very slow and kills the network.

    Posted Apr 03, 2008 04:13 PM
    I can confirm why we used to struggle with similar issues: we had some cheap switches in our rooms. There weren't enough wall jacks for each computer so there were switches in every room. As soon as we got more wall jacks and eliminated all of those cheap little switches we finally got rid of those slow ghost problems.


  • 7.  RE: Pushing out images with GSS 2.0 is very slow and kills the network.

    Posted Apr 06, 2008 11:00 PM
    Also, if you assume everything and every port is set to 100 full, then you should get around 800 P/M. If your network group replaces a switch without saving the old configuration for that switch, it goes to default, which is find the lowest speend and bring everything down to it. I have also seen Cisco IP phones on a switch and that brings the sppen down, as a cisco cannot handle 100 full.