Hi
Team,
We were making our customized reports and we encountered that SEPv11's risk types are less detailed than when we were using SAV10.X.
These data came from the logs exported in both SEP and SAV.
Here are some examples:
Trojan horse is detected as just viral in SEPv11 but classified as viral in SAV10.X
W32.Sality.FDC is detected as just viral again in SEPv11 but is classified as Worm in SAV10.X.
I could name more but this might just be enough for now.
Could there be a way to correct this Team so that the reports that we are doing would be more revealing?
Thanks,
Nel Ramos
IT-OCC