Thanks Elisha for the response, and yes this stance is more than understandable. As stated, we were very surprised that throughout the RU6 beta and then RTM build it was being listed as supported, without caveats or fine print.
I think the more major concern is that 1/ it was allowed to ship with this notion not clarified as you have just done, and that 2/ it was then quietly removed, hoping no one would notice. This is the bigger problem we have, as now to clarify this new stance with customers, they will in turn ask for Symantec's formal statement on this topic, and all we shall have is your post on the forums as a reference.
Please pass on the feedback that these kinds of mistakes, which of course can happen but really should not, need to be handled far better in the future.
Thanks again for the quick response.