SEP code breach
I am looking forward to further information from Symantec regarding the SEP code breach:
http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/06/symantec-confirms-segment-of-source-code-stolen/
I differ a little bit with Robert Rachwald's comments in the SecurityWeek article. The severity of the breach really depends on what code was lost, how much of the code is still used, and how much the code reveals about Symantec's internal architecture (which could be sigificant, even if the specific code in question is no longer in use.)
Yes, AV is signature based, but access to the source code provides a great opportunity not just for signature evasion, but understanding the Symantec internals, and determining how to bypass the software or hijack it. For a rootkit creator, it would be invaluable. I also think the point about it being an older version is largely moot – the internal program structure is likely largely the same in the latest version, so what an attacker learns from v11 is likely applicable to V12.
Mr. Paul
Comments
Data was stolen from the
Data was stolen from the Indian Military. At this point, it's hard to say how/when this will be distributed and how it will be used.
All that can be said is conjecture at this point, and anything Symantec will say will be marketing spin or require you to be a decently large customer with an NDA in place.
There is an online portal, save yourself the long hold times. Create ticket online, then call in with ticket # in hand :-) http://mysupport.symantec.com "We backup data to restore, we don't backup data just to back it up."
How could Symantec source code store in Indian military server?
I am not able to find answer how Symantec source code could store in Indian military server?
Code review?
Maybe some of these government agencies want to do a code review, before they install it on their highly sensitive systems?
Remember, these companies don't operate in a FOSS manner. How can India, Israel and others really believe that Symantec is no relaying info back to US Government or any other bad boy for that matter?
I'm sure India is also not the only one doing this type of code review to a software vendor.
Nothing to worry about!
Source code which is leaked is quite old...It has undergone many revision after that...there is nothing to worry about...that source code can not be used for any man-in-middle attack...and other mischievous deeds. Symantec is taking utmost precaution and will not let any of its customers impacted.
Thanks & Regards,
AR Sharma,
IBM Certified System Admin- Lotus Domino V7
ITIL V2 Certified
Code brach is accepted by
Code brach is accepted by Symantec, obviously it's an older one.
But it may help rivals....
Normally Any Govt. Intelligence always ask for source code of any s/w they use to verify if they are using is not a spyware or malicious one.
And this brach was major one, as this was from Military server & they claim to have access to 20 other company's software code.
Lets hope for the positive node for others too!!
Regards,
Avkash K
Helpful Link
Here is a link to Symantec's official information on the subject: http://go.symantec.com/sourcecode
That page is updated regularly with new information as it becomes available. At the moment, here are the contents:
Hope this helps clear up any misinformation! &: )
With thanks and best regards,
Mick
What products were impacted?
Until 2011 Q4, we were still using Symantec AV 10.x. I am sure we are not they only ones, as a work around was created for the expired security certificate in SAV 9.x
PS How many Windows NT install are still in active use today? Just goes to show you that the vendor might say they no longer support it & therefore it's not active, but it still is in production use.
Contact your sales rep
Symantec is investigating this situation seriously. I suggest contacting your sales rep who will be able to share any updates on the situation.
Update
Hello followers of this thread,
Just letting you know that the link above (which now forwards to http://www.symantec.com/theme.jsp?themeid=anonymous-code-claims) will soon be updated with a new statement.
With thanks and best regards,
Mick
May i know which version of
May i know which version of SEP exactly being exposed?
I would imagine something lower than 11.0.3 (MR3) ?
Thanks.
Should Not Affect SEP at All
Hi Cus000,
There shouldn't be any need to change any settings, etc for any version of SEP. This incident does not impact the functionality or safety of Symantec's current line of AV solutions.
With thanks and best regards,
Mick
Understood. Just want to
Understood.
Just want to know which SEP version has been 'looked' into by those guys.
I know the most possible impact would be on PcAnywhere?
Still unclear for me if the
Still unclear for me if the exposed source code is something that was stolen back in 2006 or if it is something really new.
Symantec had previously described a completely different scenario regarding the attack in 2006.....
I have no idea what happened
I have no idea what happened in 2006.. but i still want to know which SEP version taken by those haxors..
Why not we pin this topic anyway?
Update
New information is available on http://www.symantec.com/theme.jsp?themeid=anonymous-code-claims
An extract.....
With thanks and best regards,
Mick
Code published
And now the code has been published.
pcAnywhere and Norton Utilities 2006 affected. Possibly more to come.
Would you like to reply?
Login or Register to post your comment.