Video Screencast Help
Search Video Help Close Back
to help
New in the Rewards Catalog: Vouchers for "Symantec Technical Specialist" and "Symantec Certified Specialist" exams.

Is there a comparison document betwen 32 bit and 64 bit versions of BE?

Updated: 21 May 2010 | 2 comments
Gai-jin's picture
0 0 Votes
Login to vote
This issue has been solved. See solution.

We're preparing to move Backup Exec to a new server running 2008 R2 Standard.  I'd like to install the 64 bit version of BE on this server, but first I need to know if the 64 bit version supports all of the same features/options as the 32 bit version. 

Is there any kind of a document or support article comparing the two?

Comments

BEsymc's picture
12
Oct
2009
0 Votes 0
Login to vote

Well, there is no difference

Well, there is no difference documentation, as there is no difference. Both are same Backup Exec softwares with same features, the only difference that I can remember is that SPN is not supported with Backup Exec 12.x 64 bit. There are no other known limitations in terms of these softwares. It is totally dependent on what kind of architecture you have. So, if you have 64 bit OS, you use BE 64 bit, and if you have 32 bit OS, you go for 32 bit BE.

Please mark it a solution, if this is useful.

Thanks

Colin Weaver's picture
12
Oct
2009
1 Vote +1
Login to vote

 If you have a large Exchange

 If you have a large Exchange Server and intend to use the GRT technology then I would recommend using a 64bit Backup Exec Media Server - the memory addressing limitations on a 32bit operating system have been known to limit some GRT operations which using a 64bit Operating System (and therefore version of Backup Exec) avoids