Video Screencast Help
Search Video Help Close Back
to help

two SEPM

Created: 22 Nov 2012 | Updated: 22 Nov 2012 | 7 comments
Fariduzzaman's picture
0 0 Votes
Login to vote

Say I've two network in different place and a link between them. Should I use two different SEPM or a single SEPM what is the best way ?

there could be 50 user on each side. SEP 12.1.

Comments 7 CommentsJump to latest comment

pete_4u2002's picture

how many clients?

you can use 1 SEPm and at other location you can use GUP if the clients are less

0
Login to vote
Mithun Sanghavi's picture

Hello,

What is the bandwidth between these Sites?

Incase, you are in the Planning stage of SEPM and it's Architecture in your Environment, this Article would surely assist you:

Getting up and running on Symantec Endpoint Protection for the first time

http://www.symantec.com/docs/HOWTO55274

Also, check these 2 Threads:

https://www-secure.symantec.com/connect/forums/symantec-endpoint-protection-management-multi-site-setup

https://www-secure.symantec.com/connect/forums/running-sep-product-multiple-sites

Hope that helps!!

Mithun Sanghavi
Symantec Technical Support Engineer, SEP
MIM | MCSA | MCTS | STS | ITIL v3

Twitter: @mithun_sanghavi

Don't forget to mark your thread as 'SOLVED' with the answer that best helps you.<&a

0
Login to vote
Ambesh_444's picture

Hi,

Hope you are doing gr8..

 

As you have said that you have only 50 clients on one site, So I would advise you that you  can go for only one SEPM server, From that server you can manage both site. 

 

 

Thank& Regards,

Ambesh

Please mark your thread as 'SOLVED' with the answer that helps you.

0
Login to vote
Chetan Savade's picture

Hi,

For easy administration and to save bandwidth you should implement 1 SEPM & 1 GUP only.

If you need failover & loadbalancing/ Replication in that case 2 SEPM's one at each site. But available bandwidth should be taken into consideration.

By looking at scenario 1 SEPM & 1 GUP should satisfy business requirement.

 

Chetan Savade
Technical Support Engineer, Endpoint Security
Enterprise Technical Support
CCNA | CCNP | MCSE | SCTS |

Don't forget to mark your thread as 'SOLVED' with the answer that best helps you.&

0
Login to vote
Sumit G's picture

GUP is better solution to manage the remote location clients.

https://www-secure.symantec.com/connect/downloads/create-gup-symantec-can-help-conserve-bandwidth-clients-remote-location

Regards

Sumit G.

0
Login to vote
Brian81's picture

It will be easiest to setup one SEPM and than GUPs at your remote location(s) for content distribution.

0
Login to vote
Sumit G's picture

Your requirement fulfill or not?

Regards

Sumit G.

0
Login to vote