Hi Marianne
I installed 122058-12 on my test box which had 138269-02 and no problems were encountered. Hopefully 138269-02 will sort out your patch prereq issue

kylie# showrev -p | grep 122058-12
Patch: 122058-12 Obsoletes: 139352-02, 124361-06 Requires:  Incompatibles:  Packages: VRTSvxvm

kylie# showrev -p |grep 138269-02
Patch: 138269-02 Obsoletes: 128306-05, 128491-01 Requires: 118833-36, 120011-14 Incompatibles:  Packages: SUNWckr, SUNWcsd, SUNWhea

cheers
tony

 Hi Marianne,

I Upgraded SF 4.1 to SF 5.0 MP3RP2a on Solaris 9 and found the in the RP2a documentation the following:

■ For Storage Foundation on Solaris 9 SPARC:

# patchadd -M patch_dir 122058-12 123089-03 123201-05 123722-02 123823-05 139354-01 139357-02 139737-01 139739-01 139741-02 139742-02 139743-01 139744-01 139754-02 140657-01 140661-01 141279-01 141745-01

This is the command to upgrade to RP2a, but not all the Patches in this command is in the patches directory once it's all extracted. 
for example:

123089-03, 123201-05, 139754-02,  and 141279-01

As far as I am aware the following is the most important patch for Solaris 10:
141777-01

According to me you need the following patches supplied by RP2a:

■ For Storage Foundation on Solaris 10 SPARC:

# patchadd -M patch_dir 122058-12 123090-03 123202-05 \

123722-02 123823-05 139354-01 139358-02 139359-02 \

139737-01 139739-01 139741-02 139742-02 139743-01 \

139744-01 139754-02 140657-01 140661-01 141279-01 141745-01

■ For Storage Foundation on Solaris 10 x64:

# patchadd -M patch_dir 127336-03 127337-03 127362-03 \

128091-02 139355-01 139360-02 139361-02 139738-01 \

139740-01 139745-02 139746-02 139747-01 139748-01 \

140658-01 140662-01 141280-01

Thanks for the quick responses!
The O/S patch level on both lab servers is so old that it's a miracle that anything is still working!!
The one is 120011-14 and the other is 137111-01.
I did not read the entire patch readme to see if there's a minimum required kernel patch level.

I ran the long patchadd -M command, but with all the output produced I did not realize that there were error messages.
Only when I checked pkginfo output did I notice the 'partially installed' status of VxVM. The install output file in /var/tmp showed the patch dependancy.
Since these are only lab servers, I  installed the obsoleted patch and retried 122058-12.
This time the patch install was successful and pkginfo now shows 'completely installed'.

Tony, Hugo, can you please let me know what the O/S kernel patch level was where you've installed?
I'm sitting with July 09 EIS media on my desk. (Next task after cluster test...)

My test system had Sol10 U6, Generic_137137-09
cheers
tony

Thanks Guys!!!
You both helped - who do I assign the solution to??

 Hi Marianne,

I am sure you can assign it to Tony.

Regards
Hugo

Feel free to assign it to Hugo !
Am happy that the issue was resolved.
tony