Video Screencast Help
Search Video Help Close Back
to help
Not able to make it to Vision this year? Get a sampling in the Best of Vision on Demand group.

Ability to group policies for easier viewing

Updated: 18 Aug 2010 | 7 comments
stanleym's picture
31 Agree
1 Disagree
+30 32 Votes
Login to vote
Status: In Review

I would like to suggest an enhancement to the (windows) GUI for netbackup.
It would be nice if we could define arbitrarily-named groups so we can place policies into them. This is purely for display/grouping purposes.
We could then easily separate policies belonging to certain locations or created for a certain purpose (for example test or VCB or Exchange) so we do not need to scroll through hundreds of policies...

A variation/extension on this idea could be to have a 'view by policy', 'view by client name' or 'view by grouping' choice for the policies-treeview.

Comments

Andy Welburn's picture
07
Jan
2010
0 Votes 0
Login to vote

Similar idea:

Grouping/tree structure layout of policies

Regards Andy

"It's not too late to panic ..."

David McMullin's picture
18
Jan
2010
0 Votes 0
Login to vote

LOL, or, you could plan

LOL, or, you could plan first, and use a naming scheme....

Start your policies with a category, like WIN, UNIX, RMAN, VAULT, or TEST, PROD, QA...

Voila - it is sorted!

NBU 7.0.1 on Solaris 10
writing to EMC 4206 VTL
duplicating to LTO2 in SL8500
(Soon to be LTO5)
using ACSLS 7.3.1

stanleym's picture
19
Jan
2010
0 Votes 0
Login to vote

Even with a good naming

Even with a good naming scheme (which we actually have) you end up with hundreds of policies.

The point is that by showing the (grouped) policy list in a treeview you unfold only the category you are interested in and do not need to scroll through hundreds of policies you are not interested in...

F J's picture
15
Feb
2010
0 Votes 0
Login to vote

If you have naming

If you have naming conventions for your policies, you can use view filtering.

D.Peppas's picture
09
Feb
2011
0 Votes 0
Login to vote

you can allways have naming

you can all ways have naming conventions and something will trip you. Copy to new triggers new full backups, renaming the policy is dodgy (and unsupported, I think). Folders give you greater flexibility

Stefanos Monovasios's picture
09
Feb
2011
0 Votes 0
Login to vote

Also a memo field at the

Also a memo field at the policy attributes will be nice.

bartman10's picture
25
May
2011
0 Votes 0
Login to vote

PLEASE PLEASE!! Let us create

PLEASE PLEASE!! Let us create "folders" for the policies!! I'm not that large of a NBU shop and I even have about 100 policies! I'd love to be able to create folders like Windows, AIX, Echange, TEST, VMware!

Keep the ability to "see all" though.