Video Screencast Help

Add WOL to SEPM

Created: 25 Jun 2009 • Updated: 20 Jul 2011 | 7 comments
JRV's picture
47 Agree
2 Disagree
+45 49 Votes
Login to vote
Status: Alternative Solution

SEPM knows everything it needs to know about a client to use Wake-On-LAN to turn it on. This would be handy for a lot of admin tasks, of course. But staying on-topic, you could wake it to scan it or install a SEP upgrade, the latter being my current mission.

[Edit] And for systems with multiple subnets, SEPM should be able to use an active SEP client on each remote subnet to send the magic packet to avoid having to allow broadcasts across our VPN links.

Comments 7 CommentsJump to latest comment

Prashant Bharadwaj's picture

I wish we will 've it someday :)

Prashant Bharadwaj, CEH, MCTS Windows Server 2008 Active Directory, Configuration, SCS Symantec Endpoint Protection 11.0

0
Login to vote
AravindKM's picture

It is a good idea

Please don't forget to mark your thread solved with whatever answer helped you : ) Thanks & Regards Aravind

0
Login to vote
JimW's picture

Adding via SEPIC

Jim Waggoner Director Product Management, Symantec Endpoint Protection, Enterprise Security Group, Symantec

0
Login to vote
dan43's picture

This is an excellent idea!  Thanks Symantec for looking into this.  Since the last posting in this area was over 26 weeks ago, anyone have an update?

Thanks,
Dan

0
Login to vote
Paul Murgatroyd's picture

This has been implemented as part of SEPIC 7.1

Paul Murgatroyd
Principal Product Manager, Symantec Endpoint Protection
Endpoint twitter feed: http://twitter.com/symc_endpoint

+2
Login to vote
John Santana's picture

Cool, thanks Paul. !~

Kind regards,

John Santana
IT Professional

--------------------------------------------------

Please be nice to me as I'm newbie in this forum.

0
Login to vote
Ambesh_444's picture

Thanks paul +1 for you.

Thank& Regards,

Ambesh

"Your satisfaction is very important to us. If you find above information helpful or it has resolved your issue. Please don't forget to mark the thread as solved."

0
Login to vote