SuperUser with option "prompt" should keep the "no" box available
Created: 19 Jun 2012 | Updated: 25 Jun 2012 | 3 comments
I wonder what are the interest to activate the option "prompt user", if the user cannot reject the remote control request...
I can understand, if a "super user", and no answer from end user, we can connect and control, as not possible for a "standard" user.
But what are the benefit to activate the "prompt", in "super user" mode, if user can do nothing, else "ok" to accelerate the control... Except leaving him a few seconds to close undesired windows ???
I kindly suggest Symantec to keep the "no" button activated by default, and perhaps, adding an option to "deactivate the no button", for those wanted.
Best regards all :)
Group Ownership:
Comments 3 Comments • Jump to latest comment
Case 418-449-525
to verify not already in later or plan into future release into PCA :)
~Pascal @ Kotte.net~ Do you speak French? Et utilisez Altiris: venez nous rejoindre sur le GUASF
A user can establish a remote control session when the host computer is at the CTRL+ALT+DEL screen or is locked, behavior for Standard user vs. Superuser
~Pascal @ Kotte.net~ Do you speak French? Et utilisez Altiris: venez nous rejoindre sur le GUASF
No plan in next release... :(
~Pascal @ Kotte.net~ Do you speak French? Et utilisez Altiris: venez nous rejoindre sur le GUASF
Would you like to reply?
Login or Register to post your comment.