11.x
makkenak@un.org
|
November 9th, 2009
I have enabled policy to have applications from USB drives from running, but the cdrom drives are also blocked from applications being running, can i have the settings to enable them.
7 comments
haper
|
November 9th, 2009
I’ve installed SEPM RU5 on a new windows 2003 server.
After that I’ve used SylinkReplacer to move our win2003 servers to the new SEPM. That was no problem, but on some servers the client version is still 11.0.4202.75 instead of 11.0.5002.333.
How can I solved that problem?
6 comments
Pray4
|
November 9th, 2009
Hi,
Is there a list of event that can be sent to a syslog server from the SEP11 Managers?
(So we can create a correct "filter" for the software tenable.)
2 comments
Pray4
|
November 8th, 2009
Hi,
Can someone explain to my , if I can get a log or report of deleted inactice clients?
14 comments
Symantec World
|
November 8th, 2009
Hi Team,
As I follow the removal procedure from below URL to delete all registry entries to remove SEP and reinstall.
http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/ent-security....
And also I share this to our collogues but now I have lots of issue reported to me is some of our engineer also suggested customer to delete those entries and cutomer starts deleting th same but after that some critical servers gets crash due to deleted some windowsregistry entries.
I want to know If anyone have script which we can run directly to delete all suggested entries.
If we get this script so no one can play with registry.
Waiting your Positive response.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards
Mansoor
6 comments
Optimus Prime
|
November 8th, 2009
Is SNAC LAN Enforcer a Hardened Operating System? Can someone provide me a document to prove it?
2 comments
Jamit
|
November 8th, 2009
Hi All,
I have asked Symantec for an answer to this question but I have not had a straight answer so I thought a would put it to the wider SEP comunity.
On the Client Policy there is an option to 'Block New Clients'. I would like to know if you enable this setting on a parent group will this stop client's joining a sub group. As an example if you where to enable Blocking on the Clients and Workstations groups (marked in RED) would clients still be able to automatically join the Desktop, Laptop and Control groups (marked in Green) or would they be blocked completely? Are there any other side effects that may occur by doing this?
Thanks
3 comments
Monkeyhead
|
November 8th, 2009
Hello All
I would like to block USB Stick with the Symantec Endpoint Protection Manager.Today I using this forum (http://www.symantec.com/connect/forums/block-pen-d...).This forum will help.But from my notebook I have 4 usb port .Each usb port have different Device ID.I put all the device ID into the application & device control.It is work.If i want to block usb stick from the another PC.I will be put all the device ID into the application & device control.I think this is not the good way.So how can I block USB stick with only one device ID?
18 comments
steve.foo
|
November 8th, 2009
Hi All,
Currently i have just install Symantec Enpoint Protection on my server.
Since then, my backup time was extented from 1hr to 3hrs.
I believe that it caused by the SEP.
Currently, i have "uncheck" the Scan when a file is backed up under the console of "anitivirus and antispyware protection setting /Auto-Protect Advanced Options"
Hope you can advise me on this issue.
Thanks
SF
0 comments
Marcopollo
|
November 8th, 2009
Hi guys,
I tryed install SEP 11 in netbook running Windows 7 but it returns a error message about "Processor not Supported".
The netbook is a Microboard one with Atom 1.6 and 2GB RAM. Witch such configuration I think that any AV should work. McAfee Enterprise do.
If SEP 11 doesn't run with Atom, Symantec's web page is out-of-date. There stats EXCEPT Itanium, all Intel processors are supported (and I think Atom is a Intel processor).
Have anyone of you SEP running on a netbook? If so wich version should I install.
Thank you all.
James.
4 comments
Mosack
|
November 8th, 2009
Keep getting this message every 20 minutes or so. I scanned with SEP and it picked up nothing, additionally I've used about 5-7 other programs to try and fiure it out, and nadda. If there is something on my computer and it knows it's there, why is SEP blocking it and not attempting to get rid of it?
3 comments
joebach
|
November 8th, 2009
re: Symantec Endpoint Protection has detected that there are pending system changes that require a reboot..
For this either you restart the system or delete the registry key for pendingfilerenameoperations
I have no registry key named: "pendingfilerenameoperations" only a key named filerenameoperations which I deleted and that did not work.
Rebooting does not work.
There are no pending operations I know of.
4 comments
hemu
|
November 8th, 2009
Is these any way by which i can creat 1600 GUPS in 1600 diff group...........i need to recreat my DB.......
Please help
2 comments
MadhaviR
|
November 8th, 2009
Hi Folks
I have installed Symantec 11.0.5000.329 on Windows 7 and there is no date for virusdefintions it is blank.
7 comments
MadhaviR
|
November 8th, 2009
Hello Folks
We are in testing Phase of Symantec 11.0 . When we compare that with the SAV Corp it has some more features. I want to know about NTP and PTP? I tried to find knowledge base but was not able to get that exact and appropriate information. What ever information I could get it seems that NTP is the firewall . But I need some more information on the same.
Thanks in Advance
1 comments
Richard.Ralph
|
November 7th, 2009
I am wanting to migrate my SEPM database from SQL 2005 to a SQL 2008 database. Is there any documentation online that shows the steps to migrate the database?
0 comments
George78
|
November 7th, 2009
Hi all
I am evaluating SEP Suite for the purpose of a customer of mine. This customer is receiving huge amount of spam and virus.Symantec does a good job on stopping both risks but not with the archiving folder on exchange 2003.
I would like to know if there is any different procedure to filter all mail that is saved on exchange 2003 archive mailbox as i dont know why all spam messages are not going to junk folder.
Thanks
George
2 comments
Gersh
|
November 6th, 2009
Hi,
I upgraded from MR4MP1a to RU5
After I login, the Home, Monitor,Reports icons are blank, and I get an error "Unable to communicate with reporting component"
SEOM installed On Windows Server 2003 R2, Using Embadded Database
Tested the ODBC > Successful
6 comments
hrsand
|
November 6th, 2009
All week I've been fighting with a persistant pop up that's been accompanying repeated "Packaged Generic 214" and "Trojan Vundo" blocks by my SEP. I've enabled multiple pop-up blockers, tried Firefox and IE 8, and have scanned numerous times in safe mode, in regular mode, with system restore turned on and turned off (per advice from link at SEP Antivirus Protection Log PDF attached). Anyone else have this experience? Any advice how to resolve? TIA!
2 comments
Advanta
|
November 6th, 2009
Antivirus client should never allow to mark a message as "Sent" by user EMail client BEFORE EMailScanner sucessfully sent it.
0 comments
camerons
|
November 6th, 2009
I've running a endpoint protection server V11.0.4204.MR4.MP2. I've created a set of Antivirus/Antispyware policies which I've assigned to the appropiate group. When I goto create my client install package I setup the group in the menu that I've assigned the special policies.
The problem when I deploy the application, it appears as unmanaged, and doesn't contain any of the policies I've applied. I've verified the policies are applied and re-created the package, with exactly the same results.
The installation of the client goes textbook, but it use's the wron settings.
Any idea's?
Thanks,
0 comments
David Fanning
|
November 6th, 2009
Is there a way to select which SEPMs can be used to download updates?
We have a total of 6 SEPM's but I only want two SEPMs to download updates from the Internet. Then the other SEPMs can receive updates from the content downloaded from the SEPM, which grab updates from the Internet.
The other SEPMs have slow Internet connections.
We are running SEP 11 MR4 MP2.
Thanks.
6 comments
CatSym
|
November 6th, 2009
Quick Load of The Symantec Endpoint Protection In Any Case
Example : Malware on The PC
Early Load Feature
Also SEP - Symantec Endpoint Protection Loads Late and it can Compromise The PC security
Two Words Add An Xtra Feature for SEP To Load Faster
And A GUI improvement
0 comments
Sandraf
|
November 6th, 2009
When installing Symantec Endpoint Protection 11.0, some stations have the network threat protection installed and some don't. Did I do something wrong while installing these?
5 comments
getherington
|
November 6th, 2009
So I've created several installation packages, one for each group. When I created them I selected only Antivirus and Antispyware as my components. I moved the packages to different servers for deployment. I'm using GPOs to push them out so the packages are .msi files. The software loads one the PCs ok but it loads all the components. It loads the network threat protection and the proactive threat protection, and I don't want them!
I'm running 11.0.4
If I manually run the packages then all the components are set to be installed, I have to do a custom installation and remove what I don't want.
Any clues?
4 comments