11.x
kristopherjturner
|
November 20th, 2009
Console Error Unexpected server error. 0x10010000
I get the above error whenever I try to do pretty much anything on both my SEPM systems. I have rebooted both and have also followed a KB article about reconfiguring the Manager. Howerver, nothing is working. We are being slammed by a trojan of some kind today that has taken over pretty much every XP box and a lot of my Windows 2003 boxes. So far Vista and Windows 7 have not been touched.
I need to configure a different type of scan but can't!!!!
Kris
11.x, Endpoint Management and Virtualization, Configuring, Performance, Endpoint Protection (AntiVirus)
0 comments
DMPE
|
November 20th, 2009
Am unable to install Endpoint 11 MR5 on Windows 7 pc. Windows firewall turned off. Get Error Event ID 1033.
3 comments
HEMANPR
|
November 20th, 2009
Hello Guys
I have running Endpoint 11.0.5002.333 on my computers. Today before a new Live Update My machines with Windows XP crach and when Start Windows its continue a restart loop again and again.
I have any client reported on my EMC If I remove in savemode Symantec Endpoint on the affected computers, Windows Starts with any error but If I re-install the Symantec client 11.0.5002 the cumputers start with the same issue after restart.
HELP PLEASE How Can I fix this???
2 comments
Leo Nikora
|
November 20th, 2009
Endpoint Protection 11.0.5002.333 failed to even find (much less fix) the Sheur2 trojan.
AVG did find and fix it.
0 comments
thatdude
|
November 20th, 2009
We have a large organization and we are looking at the possible upgrade from SAV10 to SEP. If we move forward with SEP we could possibly have 50 to 100 different limited administrators around the world. It will be a PITA to add each one by AD username. Instead we would like to use Active Directory groups.
Is this possible?
1 comments
Erik_Goldoff
|
November 20th, 2009
without having to constantly check the website, is there any mechanism to sign up an email address so that I can be notified whenever a new Certified Definition is released ( for SEP 11x in my case )
Thanks
2 comments
Briandr73
|
November 20th, 2009
We have a mixed Novell & Microsoft environment. Alot of computers. Close to 3500 if not more on two SEPM's and couple GUP'S for smaller sites.
I checked out a Novell computer in one of my SEPM groups. I go to the 'General' tab. I checked out the entry for 'Domain or Workgroup'. What I saw was the DNS suffix. I should have seen the workgroup name since all Novell computers are in there. I then proceed to look at a MS computer. Again I saw the DNS suffix as opposed to the domain name. Is this a known bug? Because of how many computers we have it would be helpful to know which belong to a domain and which belong to a workgroup.
0 comments
Bernard L.
|
November 20th, 2009
11.0.4202 is running on my PC and I noticed that my proactive threat defs are not updating. How can I fix this?
Also, how do I know that other computers on my network are not having the same issue? When I look in the manager console I don't see a way to verify that all the clients on my network have the latest proactive threat defs. Is there a way to monitor this? When I pull up the Truscan threat protection distribution page it has no data in it.
1 comments
vrubino
|
November 20th, 2009
Hello everyone.
I need your help.
I created a policy in my SEP in photo, to the exclusion of the dababase of SQL, by inserting these types of database files extensions
I would like to do similarly policiy exclusion of databases of ORACLE, but I can't find these database extensions.
Someone them can provide me?
Thank you.
1 comments
Purops
|
November 20th, 2009
I am having and issue with XP 32bit and Win Svr 2008 64bit systems both running 11.0.5002.333. This server is used only for file sharing. When an XP machine tries to browse the shares they get to watch the flashlight for about one minute and then the files eventually are presented to the user. However, when I tested this with a Win 7 64bit running the same version there were no problems viewing these files. After uninstalling SEP from the server the XP users have no problems viewing these shares. Everything was fine until this week. Anybody else having this problem?
3 comments
Bryan S
|
November 20th, 2009
We have a company where there are at least 25 sites, and not ALL newly imaged machines are going to be in the same place. I will list 4 sites.
New York
Los Angeles
Houston
Chicago.
I don't want them ALL on the same site, what I want is for them to report to their OWN GUP server.
What do I need to do to get Chicago clients to point to Chicago GUP's
New York to New York and so forth...
The machines will come here and Iwant to have these machines with SEP already installed. I have a package, but it will point them to a specific group. ALL of them wiill default to the New York group based on the package, what I want to do is to divide them accordingly, and report to their servers when they get to their respective sites.
The GUP's are not in place yet, but when they are, I want the clients to point to them. What is the best approach to take at this time?
2 comments
al lister
|
November 20th, 2009
Hi,
Are we obliged to download the full version (CD1 291Mo, CD2 511Mo)? Or is it another location?
And it this version finally working, or is it another f***ing beta?
Al lister, very angry...
3 comments
Adrian Iwanczuk
|
November 20th, 2009
Hello,
I am considering upgrading from our current MR4 installation to RU5 soon and was wondering if there are any consistant issues I should be aware of. I did a quick search of the forum and found several people had issues, but I am more interested in things that everyone has been experiencing either during the upgrade process or as a result of the upgrade process. I am hesitant to upgrade as SEP as we have it is the most stable is has been since we switched and I would rather not introduce new problems into the enviroment. Supposedly there are some fixes in the previous MP updates as well as RU5 that should fix the remaining issues we have been experiencing with the product.
I am eager to get feedback from the members.
Thanks.
4 comments
Bryan S
|
November 20th, 2009
and not just the first 10? I want to be able to reference my info, but all I can see is like the first 10-12 entries. I have hundreds and want to see them all.
Thank you.
5 comments
DominikG
|
November 20th, 2009
I recognized something strange, which has been quite confusing for some of our customers. Actually the current version von Endpoint Protection (11 RU5) is published with two different version numbers. The packages, you receive through LiveUpdate are listed as 11.0.5002.0 in the Endpoint Protection Manager, but packages you create from other sources, e.g. downloads from Symantec’s fileconnect , are listed as 11.0.5002.333.
This fact makes it possible to import both versions into the Manager, if you received the packages through LiveUpdate onto your MR4 system and then upgrade it to RU5. After that you will see that four packages with the mentioned two different version numbers get listed under “install packages”.
Now, if you install the package with number 11.0.5002.0 onto a client, it gets actually also listed as installed version 11.0.5002.333. So the whole issue is just wrong information in the Manager, which the software cannot handle.
The problem is...
0 comments
AnoopDas
|
November 20th, 2009
Hi all,
I am having SMS installed on appliance 8360. and recently I got a mail from symantec regarding the EOL of SMS for SMTP. could you please how can I migrate SMS to SBG.
Regards,
Anoop
1 comments
GillB
|
November 20th, 2009
My organisation uses virtual machines that host several servers on each machine. As far as we've been led to believe, only the host machine needs SEP installed; the virtual ones will be protected by that as well. Is this the case or should we be installing SEP on every virtual machine and the host server? (I seriously hope not as the performance hit would be immense)
Thanks in advance
Gill
4 comments
Davinci_uk
|
November 20th, 2009
Hi,
So, we have our LU policy, specifiying multple GUP's (by name), this policy is linked to the generic desktop group - cxlients are currently on 3 different sites.
We have another test office - I have added the nominated GUP to the list of servernames on Rule 1.
I then rolled out the SEP client.
Since doing so, none of the clients have updated their defs (been a week now) - my guess is its trying to get from GUP and can't, as when we roll clients out to sites with no GUPs (for testing) they get their update from SEPM fairly quickly and stay up to date.
What should I check? Any ideas? Read it may work better putting an IP address isntead of name, but any tools I can use?
Thanks
6 comments
Davinci_uk
|
November 20th, 2009
Hi,
So, we have our LU policy, specifiying multple GUP's (by name), this policy is linked to the generic desktop group - cxlients are currently on 3 different sites.
We have another test office - I have added the nominated GUP to the list of servernames on Rule 1.
I then rolled out the SEP client.
Since doing so, none of the clients have updated their defs (been a week now) - my guess is its trying to get from GUP and can't, as when we roll clients out to sites with no GUPs (for testing) they get their update from SEPM fairly quickly and stay up to date.
What should I check? Any ideas? Read it may work better putting an IP address isntead of name, but any tools I can use?
Thanks
1 comments
Davinci_uk
|
November 20th, 2009
Hi,
So, we have our LU policy, specifiying multple GUP's (by name), this policy is linked to the generic desktop group - cxlients are currently on 3 different sites.
We have another test office - I have added the nominated GUP to the list of servernames on Rule 1.
I then rolled out the SEP client.
Since doing so, none of the clients have updated their defs (been a week now) - my guess is its trying to get from GUP and can't, as when we roll clients out to sites with no GUPs (for testing) they get their update from SEPM fairly quickly and stay up to date.
What should I check? Any ideas? Read it may work better putting an IP address isntead of name, but any tools I can use?
Thanks
1 comments
Monkeyhead
|
November 19th, 2009
Yesterday I install Symantec Endpoint Protection Client into the ISA 2006Server.Today morning I check my notebook and all other client, it doesn't display Proactive Threat Protection & Network Threat Protection into the Symantec Endpoint Protection. I can see Antivirus & Antispyware Protection only.How could this happen?How can i fix this error?
3 comments
sahir
|
November 19th, 2009
Dear All,
I have SAV 10.2 Server client setup spreaded across different regions in the country across WAN includes 340 clients. Now we planned to migrate SAV to SEP. Is it possible to migrate it without affecting the present setup ? What are the steps to be taken care before proceeding with migration ? What are the challeges may occur since it is a WAN setup .?
Thanks in Advance ,
Sahir.k
1 comments
soumyaghosh
|
November 19th, 2009
NOW WE ARE USING SYMANTEC ENDPOINT ANTIVIRUS 4 BUT WE HAVE PLANNED TO MIGRATE TO 5 BUT WE HAVE 500 CLIENTS SO IT IS VERY DIFFICULT TO UPDATE SERVER AND ALL CLIENTS IN A SINGLE DAY WE HAVE PLANNED FIRST WE HAVE UPDATED OUR ENDPOINT MANAGER AND UPGRADE CLIENTS GROUP WISE IN A ALTERNATE WEEKS.SO IS THERE ANY PROBLEM IF I HAVE UPDATED MY ENDPONT SERVER 5 BUT CLIENTS ARE IN VERSION 4?
SOUMYA
6 comments
Teck
|
November 19th, 2009
When i run Liveupdate in SEP manager and if i click on Show Liveupdate Downloads, under content type i see Symantec Endpoitn Protection Manager Content Catalog 11.0, under Revision 2009-04-30 rev.187 and under download time: May 4 2009.
How do i update the Content Catalog ?
Please Help.
4 comments
swede375
|
November 19th, 2009
Hello-
We are running SEP 11.0.4202.75. About 30% of our clients have weird file names like:
t1b0
t1b0.1
t1b0.2
etc... etc...
The files contain information like this:
00000073 01ca1f3143fadac0 12070218 00000000 00000000 00000000 Symantec Management Client has been activated. Smc
d. Smc
000000000073 01ca1f3143fde920 12070218 00000000 00000000 00000000 Symantec Management Client has been activated. Smc
000000da 01ca1f314671f330 12070201 00000000 00000000 00000000 Network Threat Protection -- Engine version: 11.0.51
Windows Version info:
Operating System: Windows XP (5.1.2600 Service Pack 3)
Network info:
Smc
00000071 01ca1f314671f330 12070202 00000000 00000000 00000000 Symantec Management Client has been started. Smc
00000081 01ca1f31b04671a0 12070301 00000000 00000000 00000000 ...
4 comments