I need a solution
Hi!
We have two Puredisk 6.6.1.2.EEB20 SPA's; we have seven content routers per SPA and each SPA sits at around 59% utilisation of 185TB usable space per SPA. ...
I need a solution
We have two Puredisk SPA's each with seven content routers addressing a total of 138TB per SPA. We only use Puredisk for Netbackup PDDO backups.
Does anyone ...
I need a solution
Under Puredisk 6.5 one could add extra space to some already existing content routers in a SPA and then use the Configuration/Topology/Storage Pool Name/Reroute ...
I need a solution
Regarding Puredisk Content Router Garbage Collection workflows, is there a way to determine how far a run of this has got to and when it will end? I'm looking for ...
I need a solution
We've two Puredisk SPA pools each around 100TB and about 70% full. We use Puredisk for PDDO Netbackup images only. We're currently on Puredisk 6.5.1.2 moving ...
I need a solution
So, just a simple question. Using Puredisk in a Netbackup 6.5.4 PDDO environment, is Puredisk
6.6.(0.3) faster than 6.5.1.2 and if so, how much faster and why?
...
I need a solution
Hi!
We have two very large (nearly 100TB) Puredisk SPA's running 6.5.1.2. I will be upgrading them to 6.6.0.3 in the next few months - all went well on a test ...
I need a solution
We have two Puredisk SPA's and each consists of an unclustered setup of two content routers with one being the metabase engine as well.
We use Netbackup via ...
This issue has been solved
I need a solution
We are in a POC for Puredisk for Netbackup PDDO agents on our Netbackup media servers.
We've run a lot of successful de-duped backups with some 6TB of ...