Video Screencast Help
Symantec to Separate Into Two Focused, Industry-Leading Technology Companies. Learn more.
Netting Out NetBackup
Showing posts tagged with NetBackup
Showing posts in English
TimBurlowski | 30 Jan 2009 | 0 comments

I recently had the chance to interview Steve Whitner from Quantum. This is the third in a series of interviews with our Open Storage partners.  On January 27, 2009, Quantum announced the refresh for their DXi7500 Express and DXi7500 Enterprise both of which support the NetBackup Open Storage API. Steve Whitner works as a Product Marketing Manager for DXi and related disk products. Steve is an industry veteran working at ADIC then Quantum for over ten years.

 

Q) I'm interviewing you specifically about the OpenStorage program. You will be among the first few vendors set to release an OpenStorage solution. From your perspective what is the problem the OpenStorage program is trying to solve in the backup and recovery workflow?

 

A) Our customer requirements for backups have changed over the years. Today they need to write and restore data quickly while retaining the data for longer periods of time, but with minimal space, power & cooling...

TimBurlowski | 29 Jan 2009 | 0 comments

Scott Waterhouse who writes at the “Backup Blog” posted a good note about an important and often ignored setting for NetBackup media servers. He references this in relation to EDL, the disk library which has an embedded NetBackup media server, although it is a useful tip for many other circumstances . He points out the need to make sure that you set up NetBackup correctly so that when you duplicate tapes or images it doesn’t require the data to traverse your IP network and slow your duplication down significantly. You do this by correctly setting the alternate read server for your duplication which you can do for a Disk Staging Storage Unit, in Vault or in a Storage Life Cycle policy.

Nice work Scott.

Tim Burlowski
...

Mayur Dewaikar | 29 Jan 2009 | 1 comment

A few months back, I was riding in my colleague’s car and his iPOD interface to the car caught my eye. His car did not have a “native iPOD adapter” and so he had bought this aftermarket device that plugged into his iPOD and allowed him to control the iPOD directly from his car’s audio controls. He said “it is like Symantec OpenStorage (OST). Just as OST allows NetBackup to control appliances intelligently, this device allows your car to control the iPOD more efficiently”. His analogy was simple and yet so powerful. This discussion was my OST “A-HA moment” and got me intrigued.

 

 As I took on a more active role in NetBackup disk offerings in the months that followed, I learned more about OST and realized how powerful the concept was.  In the past, there have been several misconceptions around OST. Many have thought it to be Symantec’s attempt to kill the VTL appliances and replace them with regular...

TimBurlowski | 28 Jan 2009 | 0 comments

In my last post, I discussed backup redesign, emphasizing the need to begin with an analysis of the basics which include understanding and analyzing RPO and RTO.

The acronyms RTO and RPO used to cause hands to be raised in presentations as they weren’t well understood by our industry. It seems like they have become standard terms in our industry, but let’s define them for completeness.

RPO — this stands for Recovery Point Objective. In the book, “Implementing Backup and Recovery” written by David Little and David Chapa it is defined as “How far back in time you are willing to go to recover.” If you backup once a day at midnight, and you delete a file at 11:59 PM the next day you...

CRZ | 27 Jan 2009 | 5 comments

I'm pleased to announce that a Beta program for the NetBackup 6.5.4 Release Update will be starting soon!  If you'd like to get involved, please refer to the following TechNote for more information:

 

Veritas NetBackup 6.5.4 Beta Program

 http://entsupport.symantec.com/docs/318005

 

Vilobh Meshram | 26 Jan 2009 | 5 comments

Note:  This is not a recommended procedure.  It should be used only in extreme situations and as a last step in attempting to restore data. This procedure has been used on numerous occasions with success.

First, figure out the fragment number and the block size needed.

Ex:

# ./bpmedialist -mcontents -ev D0004
media id = D0004, allocated 09/21/99 14:19:, retention level = 1

File number 1
 Backup id = jeckle_0937941543
 Creation date = 09/21/99 14:19:
 Expiration date = 10/05/99 14:19:
 Retention level = 1
 Copy number = 1
 Fragment number = 1
 Block size (in bytes) = 32768

Then work the tape:

ficus# tpreq -ev D0004 -a r -d dlt -p NetBackup -f /tmp/mytape

This issues a tpreq for media id D0004, the " r " is for read, the " -d " is density, " -p " is pool and " -f " is mount point.

ficus# /usr/...

jolexa | 20 Jan 2009 | 0 comments

The Hardware Compatibility Lab has pushed some changes through to enhance the aesthetics of the Hardware Compatibility List. You will notice that the OS support is now split up into UNIX & Linux/Windows for each vendor, so it should be easier to read. We decided to go through with these changes because we have lost a significant amount of page real estate due to the increase in total OS's supported. Comments welcome. Enjoy!

 

6.5 HCL Link: http://support.veritas.com/docs/284599

Daniel Hoffer | 14 Jan 2009 | 1 comment

I bought a box of Frosted Flakes recently - this was a departure from my usual diet of Froot Loops, I make my life very exciting with these spontaneous bursts of adventure. One thing I noticed on my box of Frosted Flakes was a big bright bubble that said, "Less sugar!" and in much smaller letters beneath it, "than original Frosted Flakes." This is of course a meaningless comparison. Less sugar than the original may still mean "way too much sugar." 

 

In the technology industry, one of the tactics software companies sometimes use to increase the chance of closing a sale is "FUD": Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt, which basically means injecting misleading information into a sale process. There has been some interesting FUD circulating around backup vendor support for VMware's ESX and ESXi platforms. ESXi and ESX are essentially identical from a functionality perspective. To quote VMware.com, "...

TimBurlowski | 14 Jan 2009 | 0 comments

I noticed there has been some good NetBackup discussions going on at linkedin.com. Challenging times are a great reason to work on expanding your network.

 

NetBackup System Administrators Group

 

Tim Burlowski

Techical Product Manager

Data Protection 

Symantec

Daniel Hoffer | 07 Jan 2009 | 0 comments

I have a few New Year’s resolutions: 1) Eat less, 2) exercise more, and 3) share some thoughts around the term “granular recovery” when it comes to VMware and VCB backups. Hopes are high and I am confident I will be able to achieve at least one of my three resolutions.

 

Most folks are already familiar with the “2 for 1” idea behind NetBackup for VMware – the idea that based on a single VCB backup pass, it is possible to restore either an entire VM image or an individual file. This is advanced patent-pending technology for Symantec and no other vendor can do this. However, some of our competitors claim that they have this functionality, while in reality what they have is actually far more primitive and far less useful.

 

The chart below outlines the steps involved in restoring a single 1 MB file from a VCB image-level backup using NetBackup, and compares it to the same process using almost all competitive...