Video Screencast Help
Search Video Help Close Back
to help

Security Community Blog

Showing posts in English
Kevin Rowney | 10 Mar 2009 | 0 comments

Myth  #6 -- Access Control will protect you

 

Origin

Clearly, enforcement of need-to-know on key assets is a necessary component of managing the risks of confidentiality breaches.  Without access control, you have no hope of protecting the data.  The myth here is that this kind of protection is sufficient.  Given the huge amount of money, time, and attention paid to this aspect of security, you would hope that locking down your information this way would be enough!

 

What we see

The rates of data loss we see at customer sites indicate that access control privileges, even in the best run shops, are at least a step or two behind the needed state of provisioning to adequately protect data.  Part of that is driven by the complexity of...

Kevin Rowney | 02 Mar 2009 | 0 comments

Myth #5 – Classroom-format employee security education works

 

Origin

This is another well-documented "fact" found in security textbooks that turns out to be largely false.  No one would argue that its bad thing for employees to know the basics about compliance with state, federal, and enterprise regulations and policies. But what most practitioners don't realize is that basic classroom-format training has little measurable effect on employee-driven data loss rates.

 

What we see

We've run hundreds of DLP risk assessments at large enterprises.  In many of these engagements, we've scheduled the assessment in tandem with employee privacy training in an attempt to measure changes in behavior that the training might elicit.  Amazingly, we've never...

Kevin Rowney | 02 Mar 2009 | 0 comments

Myth  #4 -- Encryption as a primary effective control against data loss

 

Origin

This myth has a long history since encryption technology predates the digital era.  Encryption, as the first choice of protection measures against data loss is, almost a sacred cow of information security trade craft.  Most practitioners simply take it for granted that encryption (and for that matter DRM) are basic forms of protection that should be your first choice of technologies to help prevent the theft of data.

 

What we see

Obviously, a large number of basic applications of encryption are vital and necessary protection measures.  Automatic protection of content via encryption is a fundamental security protection with well-established value.  Whole-disk encryption of laptops, basic...

Kevin Rowney | 02 Mar 2009 | 0 comments

Myth #3 -- Information Classification is a necessary pre-requisite to protecting your data

 

Origin

Not only does this myth receive strong implicit backing from many security textbooks, there's also a whole flotilla of startups and a phalanx of security analysts making this claim.  To anyone who hasn't seen a DLP solution at work in a large enterprise environment, it at least looks plausible that this myth is in fact true.

 

What we see

This myth has received some pretty thorough rebuking by Data Loss Prevention deployments.  Projects that attempt to classify everything first before moving on to remediation of their data exposure problems invariably end in one of two ways: 1) the project runs out of time and money before all assets can be classified, or 2) a...

Kevin Rowney | 02 Mar 2009 | 0 comments

Myth  #2 -- The standard model of perimeter security protects the enterprise

 

Origin

In one sense, this is one of those myths that most practitioners already know to be false.  Wherever you look (practitioners working at large enterprises, activists like the New School gang or the Jericho crew, or nearly any security blog) it’s not hard to see consistent criticism of the current working model for security.  What's strange is that, in the face of this rough consensus of the failure of the standard model, why is there so little progress addressing the alarming acceleration of publicly reported breaches?

 

What we see

From our perspective, there’s pretty stark evidence that backs up the claim that the standard model is broken.  With...

Kevin Rowney | 02 Mar 2009 | 0 comments

Myth #1 -- The vendor community does not solve the problems most in need of solving

 

 

Origin of this myth

You hear this implicit accusation from many parties (analysts chief among them).  A typical example is in Shostack’s and Stewart’s “The New School of Information Security”. A quote that is emblematic of this attitude: “There's an elephant in the room.  That elephant is the assumption that the security industry has evolved to solve the problems most in need of solving”.  [p.27]

 

We see things differently

Working at the leading vendor of Data Loss Prevention solutions provides a pretty interesting vantage point on current security tradecraft.  We have unique insight on the real terms of treatment of the most sensitive data at some...

BradKingsbury | 02 Mar 2009 | 0 comments

Last time we took a look at some of the performance improvements we made in MR3 in the client towards our goal of "zero-impact security".  Now let's look at some of the changes we made in the management server itself.


One of the biggest improvements is a change we made in the LiveUpdate signature delta generator.  When LiveUpdate runs on the management server and downloads new virus and IPS signatures from the Symantec server, it creates deltas, so that minimal data is transmitted over your company's pipes when your clients request the latest virus and IPS signatures.  We completely redid the delta generator in MR3, resulting in an increase of 1000% in time to create the deltas!  Not only is this process unbelievably faster than before, but it also creates significantly smaller deltas.  The overall benefit is that the management server is more responsive than before, since it is no longer spending as much time creating deltas.


...

Kevin Rowney | 02 Mar 2009 | 0 comments

Recently Hoff posted the irony-enhanced “Cloud Providers Are Better At Securing Your Data Than You Are..."  as a reaction to “The Cloud is not That Insecure”  up on GnuCitizen by PDP.   It’s tough to expect any clear and firm conclusions on this debate since the notion of what “security” means in these two posts is not really that well synched up with the underlying causes of data loss.

Hoff and PDP both seem to be focused on comparing cloud computing platforms with enterprises on the level of diligence each show on classic countermeasures like perimeter security and communications security.  PDP observes that Google and Amazon and others seem to present “rock solid” systems that achieve higher levels of protection simply because the IT goals of service providers...

Ian McShane | 02 Mar 2009 | 0 comments

Our next major release, Brightmail Gateway 8.0, is coming soon andwith that, we are now open for applications to join our beta program.

Becausewe like to get as many customers and as diverse deployments involved as possible, itdoesn't matter if you have 50 people protected by Brightmail or 50,000.

In order to participate, you'll need to have either spareappliance hardware (for example, a retired 82xx series appliance thatyou have for a test environment) or access to VMWare virtualisationproducts in order to run the Brightmail Gateway Virtual Edition.  Thereis _some_ scope for us to provide you with a loaner HW appliance butthese are limited in number and first come first serve!

 

Ifyour company is interested in joining, get the ball rolling by droppingme an email to ian_mcshane@symantec.com with a few details such as:

 

STN Forum username (if applicable), actual name and job...

Kevin Rowney | 02 Mar 2009 | 0 comments


There’s been a recent run of blog postings  here and here reinforcing the fundamental importance of detection accuracy in DLP.  We fundamentally agree.  Starting in 2001, and over the course of the past seven years, many of the defining characteristics of what is now considered Data Loss Prevention were brought to the market by the DLP division of Symantec (once known as Vontu).   New breakthroughs in detection accuracy were among these category-defining innovations that in fact made big swaths of the DLP space viable.

 

Delivering DLP Solutions Looks a Lot Easier Than it is

As Heather Schneider (of RSA) indicates in her post on...