Video Screencast Help
Search Video Help Close Back
to help
Not able to make it to Vision this year? Get a sampling in the Best of Vision on Demand group.

Security Response

Showing posts in English remove filter
Andrea Lelli | 24 May 2012 | 0 comments

A number of days ago, we observed a new variant of the W32.Xpaj.B virus and we blogged all of the initial details about its new features and how the outbreak sample is the patient zero of the infection. We have now done more analysis and the conclusion is in: there is no outbreak and W32.Xpaj.B is not coming back, at least for now.

From the analysis we uncovered the following:

  • Samples infected by patient zero do not have the capability to infect other samples
  • A 64-bit kernel mode payload injects a Dynamic-Link Library (DLL) into the target processes, but the DLL is empty
  • Infected samples do not carry a copy of the virus body from patient zero, but they are infected with a substantially smaller version of the virus...
Symantec Security Response | 24 May 2012 | 0 comments

Analysis by: Hiroshi Shinotsuka

Recent malware campaigns that used Tibet-related issues as bait have been well documented and it should come as no surprise that we have seen another Tibetan-themed attack using a malicious Word document. The emails involved in the attack are in English and were sent to a clothing company in the United States.

While they appear to come from Tibet-related organizations, the email headers revealed that they were sent from a mail server in Russia.

Recently, we discovered a file that differs to other malware in that it uses a well-known graphics card manufacturer’s legitimately signed program as an attack vector.

After opening the attached...

Val S | 23 May 2012 | 0 comments

Contributor: Branko Spasojevic

A recent post on Pastebin revealed that a simple command can provide root access to the ZTE Score mobile device. This escalation of privilege can give you full control of a ZTE Score M phone running Android 2.3.4 (Gingerbread). We analyzed both the MetroPCS and Cricket Wireless versions of the device and we were able to reproduce the privilege escalation.

The Android security model sandboxes applications so they cannot interact with other applications nor directly perform system level commands without specific authorization preventing undesired affects. The privilege escalation allows one to bypass the default Android security model and run any code on the device and make any modifications unchecked.

The privilege escalation was not a bug in code on the device, but instead likely a design feature for carrier administration purposes or troubleshooting. Unfortunately, irrespective of the reason this code was included, by...

Paresh Joshi | 21 May 2012 | 0 comments

For anti-spam software, it is quite easy to prevent spam by using content-based filters. So spammers come up with different obfuscation techniques to bypass URL-based filters such as inserting “shy characters”, as we have discussed previously. Recently, spammers have been trying to cash-in on the smallest of gaps that they could find in conventional anti-spam technologies. Spammers are now attempting to obfuscate the URLs in spam messages, either by inserting white space characters of varying sizes or by replacing the conventional “.” (dot) character by “。” (An ideographic full-stop, mostly used in Asian languages)

How did they do it? Let’s take a look at both of these techniques.

Using different size white space characters is allowed in HTML. All languages use spaces to separate words. However, the size of the white space characters...

Takashi Katsuki | 18 May 2012 | 0 comments

W32.Wergimog is a worm that attempts to spread through removable drives and opens a back door. When I looked into its variants, I found an interesting sample, which I named W32.Wergimog.B. Both samples are based on the same source code, but the .B variant contains even more interesting functionality that I would like to detail here.
 

For legitimate applications

W32.Wergimog.B injects itself into legitimate applications, such as Internet Explorer and Mozilla Firefox, as shown in Figure 1.
 

Figure 1. Threat injects itself into certain applications and...

Nick Johnston | 18 May 2012 | 0 comments

Today sees the highly-anticipated IPO (Initial Public Offering) of the social-networking site Facebook. The IPO is expected to be several times oversubscribed as the demand for shares greatly exceeds the number of shares being issued.

The high-profile nature of this IPO has not escaped the attention of the “419” or the “advance fee fraud” scammers. As a brief reminder, these scams typically promise vast sums of money in exchange for assistance. However, before said sums of money can be received, several increasingly-inventive up-front charges and fees must be paid. The fees keep coming and the promised money never materializes.

We recently spotted a 419 scam message offering a "FACEBOOK (IPO) SUBSCRIPTION PARTNERSHIP PROPOSAL". The use of an all uppercase heading is a common hallmark of such 419 scams.

The scam claims to be sent from a finance firm with offices in multiple locations around the world. The exact nature of the...

Joji Hamada | 17 May 2012 | 0 comments

Android.Opfake is malware used to scam mobile device owners into paying a small fee for apps by sending out premium-rate SMS messages from Android devices. It has continued to grow and evolve into a threat that potentially affects a large population of Russian-speaking Android device owners. A quick Internet search will show over a hundred sites, including dedicated sites for popular apps and other sites, pretending to be app market sites with various apps available. There are several variants of Android.Opfake hosted on these sites with different methods to lure victims there initially, and different steps involved in each scam.

We recently came across one variant that carries out its actions in an interesting fashion. The end result makes it so obvious that Android.Opfake is fraudulent because it directs the device owner to Google Play to install the app even though installation...

Masaki Suenaga | 17 May 2012 | 0 comments

Pre-dating many of the mobile platforms it currently targets and outlasting several of the mobile platforms where it originated from, Android.Opfake has a tendency for survival on the mobile threat landscape not unlike roaches in the aftermath of a nuclear holocaust. Combing business savvy through a strong black market affiliate network and quick reaction time to adapt itself to thwart efforts by security vendors, Opfake has not only managed to stay in business for several  years, the Opfake family has come to define the evolution of mobile malware.

Like many traditional Trojan horses, on the surface Android.Opfake purports to be a legitimate application. In fact, we have observed several variants of the Trojan masquerading as various apps and content, including an installer for the Opera Web browser and a pornographic movie. Analysis of the code behind the malicious program,...

Mathew Maniyara | 16 May 2012 | 0 comments

Co-author: Avdhoot Patil

Phishers have enveloped the globe mimicking brands across a variety of industries and using many languages. From April 2012, phishing attacks in Korean gained momentum, comprising of 0.5 percent of all non-English phishing sites. The increase was in particular targeting banks based in South Korea. The primary motive in these attacks is financial gain, as it is in most phishing attacks. Let’s explore some of the phishing sites we have observed.

In the first example, the phishing site asked for the customer’s name, social security number, cell phone number, account number, account password, and transfer password. After the information was entered, the customer was redirected to a page that asked for the security card serial number. The phishing site then redirected back to the legitimate site.

...

Symantec Security Response | 16 May 2012 | 0 comments

Further analysis of the OSX.Flashback botnet has shed more light on how profitable such a botnet can be. Previously, we wrote that OSX.Flashback was generating money for its authors by displaying advertisements on compromised computers. We now have a much clearer idea of how many ads the attackers were displaying and how much those ads earned for the attackers.

From our analysis we have seen that, for a three-week period starting in April, the botnet displayed over 10 million ads on compromised computers but only a small percentage of users who were shown ads actually clicked them, with close to 400,000 ads being clicked. These numbers earned the attackers $14,000 in these three weeks, although it is worth mentioning that earning the money is only one part of the puzzle—actually...