FeaturesSyndicate content

Bijay.Swain | November 7th, 2009
How to turn off replication between two sites? I want to reinstall my replication site again so how to turn off replication before uninstalling it.
2 comments
asuits | November 6th, 2009
I googled it but really didn't see any comparison list for either.  Can someone tell me what the differences are between Wise Package Studio Pro version 5 and version 8 ? With kind regards, Mark
0 comments
ant2010 | November 6th, 2009
My Domain server has this problem 2 weeks ago. it worked fine before. About every one day, the DC server will automatically create user's profile under "document and setting" in server. No roaming profile was set. when we have this problem, we cannot access the shared folder in server. Restart the server solve it temporary but about 10 hours later, same problem come again. I searched the solutions for this problem, some one suggested uninstall symantec, so I stopped all symantec service in DC server, and seems the problem fixed. we use symantec antivirus version 10.1.5.5002. any one know how to fix it? Any suggestion would be appreciated.. Thanks, Ant
1 comments
Steelejaxon | November 6th, 2009
New to SSIM. I have made several changes to the correlation rules (ex. changed the Windows account lockout to excude a certain username who frequently gets locked out). However, even after making the change, I am still getting incidents based on these changes. Another examples is the Spyware Not Quarentined events. I made a change to exclude any events in which the words "google search bar" appear in the Name field as this is a common false positive for us. Again, I have seen incidents with events which should be excluded pop up after I made the changes. I have the custom (User) rule checked and the default (System) is deselected. Any ideas?
1 comments
Advanta | November 6th, 2009
Antivirus client should never allow to mark a message as "Sent"  by user EMail client BEFORE EMailScanner sucessfully sent it.  
0 comments
CatSym | November 6th, 2009
Quick Load of The Symantec Endpoint Protection In Any Case Example : Malware on The PC Early Load Feature Also SEP - Symantec Endpoint Protection Loads Late and it can Compromise The PC security Two Words Add An Xtra Feature for SEP To Load Faster And A GUI improvement  
0 comments
Bijay.Swain | November 6th, 2009
Is scanning speed in SEP11RU5 faster then sep11mr4mp2 ? Scanning of 8GB of data takes more than 90 minutes in sep11mr4mp2 .
1 comments
Bijay.Swain | November 6th, 2009
replication between two sites is incremental or copies the whole database everytime replication happens.
3 comments
Bijay.Swain | November 6th, 2009
I created an addition site as replication partner to my main site in SEP. but when I open the SEPM console on the addition site top three links don't work and gives an error as unable to communicate with the reporting component. what could be the problem other tabs are working fine. OS:- Windows2k3sp2 SEPM ver- SEP11RU5 RAM-2GB Server-XEON dual processor server
11 comments
Chares | November 6th, 2009
Hi symantec community, I've been delving over PDFs and Manuals over all symantec and still cant get a straight response, even i tried to get email support (and telephone) and it redirects me to symantec connect. The problem is that i need an official response from Symantec that Backup Exec 12.5 SP2 does not support security roles, and it depends entirely on windows permissions. I know ofr fact that it is as im descrbing it, but still i need an official response for a report over an installation of Backup Exec. anything that you recommend or require i'll be glad to help! Thanks for your time!
0 comments
Mithun Sanghavi | November 6th, 2009
Hello, Symantec Endpoint Protection Manager needs to have more Functionality and Features in regards to Group Update Provider. Today, Symantec Endpoint Protection Manager RU5 have added good Functionality. Check the Following KB's 1) New features and functionality in Symantec Endpoint Protection Release Update 5 (SEP RU 5) Group Update Provider (GUP) http://service1.symantec.com/support/ent-security.nsf/854fa02b4f5013678825731a007d06af/74cab076e9ab68f64925763f005a2237?OpenDocument 2) Configuring the Group Update Provider (GUP) in Symantec Endpoint Protection 11.0 RU5 http://service1.symantec.com/support/ent-security.nsf/854fa02b4f5013678825731a007d06af/cb487ea7138bf8d24925763f00708be0?OpenDocument But even today, we are don't have much to check on How to handle the GUP's from SEPM other than visiting the Groups Liveupdate Policy. Suggestions: 1) Customers do not have a way to create a Log for GUP seperately. We are looking forward for a Seperate...
1 comments
drew at NF | November 6th, 2009
AVG has a nifty thing called LinkScanner (see: http://www.linkscanner.avg.com/).  Most of the infected machines that I have to work with recently have gotten infected via the web.  Does SEPSBE 12 have this type of funtionality built in or available as a addon?
1 comments
drew at NF | November 6th, 2009
AVG has a nifty thing called LinkScanner (see: http://www.linkscanner.avg.com/).  Most of the infected machines that I have to work with recently have gotten infected via the web.  Does SEP 11 have this type of funtionality built in or available as a addon?
5 comments
jz81 | November 5th, 2009
In SWV 6.1 there is a feature called "Auto Run From Layer". It would be nice to have a similar global feature "Auto Run From Base" that defines processes that should never run from a layer or at least act as if they were started from the base. An Example: right now when a user receives a mail (using virtualized mail software) containing a url to an installer and the user clicks this link, iexplorer.exe and ultimately even the installer when immediately run will run from this virtual layer. In many cases it is not the desired outcome to have this software installed in (the writable sublayer of) the layer. "Auto Run from Base" would provide a way to deal with this problem.
0 comments
fitrat | November 5th, 2009
Hi All We have a team of 8 members We need to track all the changes in netbackup environment specially backup policy configuration Please suggest me how can we track the changes like below 1. who has modified the backup policies / schedule / backup selection / attributes / bp.conf 2. what has been modified in the backup policies / schedule / backup selection / attributes / bp.conf      Old vaule & new vaule 3. When changes are done ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: etc etc.................. Please suggest Thanks in advance FitRat
4 comments
Jay Son | November 5th, 2009
NBU 6.5.4 OS = AIX 6 3 UNIX media server incl. master server 2 Windows media servers 10 (LTO3) drives allocated for our Filers - fiber connected With VMWare on the rise, I've been backing up RDM and VMFS volumes with FULL backups only. Mainly, I come in AFTER the volume on our filers has taken a snapshot of the VMWare clusters  We have a script (for NBU) that will append/add the list of volumes to our policy (Backup Selection List). My concern is that our LTO tapes are being "eaten" up by these backups because we do complete FULL backups daily. Whereas, when these virtual machines/servers were once physical machines, which ALLOWED me to take INCREMENTAL backups, resulting in fewer tapes utilized. We're finding ourselves scrounging to look for scratches, weekly (sometimes daily). Ultimately I want to stay with tapes. My questions are: What is your recommendation (best-in-class) approach to relieve...
1 comments
FbacchinZF | November 5th, 2009
Is there any plans to Symantec Endpoint Proteciton support Itanium-based Systems in the future? Maybe MR6 or SEP12 ? Reards, Fernando Bacchin  
6 comments
jcrodriguez@kpmg.com | November 5th, 2009
I need to know what are the advantage if I make the installation of this new package. If there are any issues reported. Any thing find as relevant to do the succesful deployment of this package. I have 550 clients with Windows XP and 100 with windows Vista.
3 comments
GauravAditya | November 5th, 2009
 Hello All, I have been facing a lot of trouble with the EV Search archive issues. Following is the list of the ones encountered till now: - 1. Search not working properly: - Date range search is not getting all the mails in that range.  (Example: In my mail box if there are 6 archived mails on Date 15/11/08 , a search from 15/11/08 to 15/11/08 gets only three mails. - Mails out of range is also retrieved. (Example: If search from and to date is 10/11/08 to 11/11/08, mails of 12/11/08 are also retrieved) ------------------------------------------------------- 2. Multiple copies of the mails are being restored: When a single mail from vault is restored to mail box, multiple copies of the same mail are restored (Example: I restored a specific archived mail of 28/08/08 and now there are six copies of the same mail and same date restored in my mail box) ------------------------------------------------------- 3. When a basket is created and restored, the status shows as ‘...
2 comments
Celtic | November 5th, 2009
Hi, When the PST locator task is run does it firsly locate all machines in active directory before it starts scanning for pst's. I have it configured to scan active directory and to scan the computer registry. So far its built up a list of machines but no pst locations yet. Do I just need to be more patient? No errors are been reported in the event log. Oh an why is it recommeded that the evault service account is not a domain admin? cheers P
4 comments
Aaron T | November 4th, 2009
Hi All, I'm pretty open about this. As we wait for Version 7 of the Asset Management Solution, I was wondering if there is ANY way to just add a date to a PC resource, i.e another field in the a table or something..somewhere..anything?? I'm trying to think of a simple way to do this. At the moment we can grab a good list containing PC names, service tags, model/brand - if i can somehow put a date to that and have the report bring it out..thats all I really need. Interested to hear thoughts/suggestions Thanks
1 comments
M_S_Bannon | November 4th, 2009
Has anyone had any experiences with BESR 8.5 or better quiescing Hyper-V drives via VSS? Is it possible for BESR to quiesce the VHD of a virtual machine in Hyper-V much in the way that DPM does and allow a backup of the VM to be made without shutting it down?
0 comments
Andrey Wang | November 4th, 2009
Hi,Guys:   how can i scheduled atuomated fowarding events from a ssim to another's; for example, if i configurated the time range that the ssim would forwarding events to another ssim on schedule, it looks like a schedule liveupdate or sending reports.   it's vital importance and can you find a solution to me?   thanks a lot.  
0 comments
Alex Vasquez | November 4th, 2009
**Sorry for the duplicate post The Issue: I'm attempting to do aVMware file/folder restore of some backups that I had performed.  I'm attempting to do a 2 stage restore, where I restore the data to a server with the netbackup client installed on it and then copy the files over to the appropriate vm. 11/4/2009 3:10:49 PM - begin Restore 11/4/2009 3:10:51 PM - restoring image corpfdw602.xxx.xxx.xxx_1257370172 11/4/2009 3:10:51 PM - requesting resource @aaaaJ 11/4/2009 3:10:51 PM - granted resource MediaID=@aaaaJ;DiskVolume=lsu_nbdd02;DiskPool=lsu_nbdd02_dp;Path=lsu_nbdd02;StorageServer=nbdd02;MediaServer=bkupcorp01 11/4/2009 3:10:56 PM - started process bpdm (3664) 11/4/2009 3:11:00 PM - started process bpdm (3728) 11/4/2009 3:11:03 PM - begin reading 11/4/2009 3:11:05 PM - end reading; read time: 00:00:02 11/4/2009 3:11:05 PM - begin reading 11/4/2009 3:11:14 PM - end reading; read time: 00:00:09 11/4/2009 3:11:13 PM - connecting 11/4/2009 3:11:16 PM - connected; connect...
0 comments
Peter Shute | November 4th, 2009
I would like job histories to be presented in a tabular format, rather than hierarchical.  E.g. server1\c$ 4.1GB backed up in 201,431 files  4.0GB verified in 201,430 files Started 11:01pm Finished 11:30pm etc, etc server1\e$ 45GB  backed up in 201,431 files  45GB  verified in 201,430 files Started 11:30pm Finished 01:30am etc, etc server2\c$ 5.1GB backed up in 201,431 files  5.0GB verified in 201,430 files Started 01:30am Finished 01:57ametc, etc server2\e$ 4.1GB backed up in 201,431 files  4.0GB verified in 201,430 files Started 01:57am Finished 02:30am etc, etc Total           58.3GB etc, etc, etc. The current histories need to be expanded and expanded and expanded to find out what happened, until you can't see where you are on the page anymore.  Tabular format lets you easily see what has happened.  It could still contain hyperlinks to look at errors, etc. This is the report I'd like...
0 comments