tekkid

Profile

tekkid
Member for: 3 years 32 weeks
Contact: Send this user an email

Member for: 3 years 32 weeks

Blog: View recent blog entries

Contribution Stats

Solution

Forum Threads

107

Comments

Blog Entries

Ideas

Articles

Videos

Downloads

Events

Groups Joined

tekkid's Activity

Show:

discussion comment 01 Oct 2010

tekkid commented on: Trojan.Zbot not being removed by RR definition like Symantec says it would

10/1/2010 r32 took care of it.

discussion comment 01 Oct 2010

tekkid commented on: Trojan.Zbot not being removed by RR definition like Symantec says it would

v23 has Trojan.Zbot update, it hasn't posted yet, will try that one next.

discussion comment 01 Oct 2010

tekkid commented on: Trojan.Zbot not being removed by RR definition like Symantec says it would

That is the definition set I downloaded...no dice.

New forum discussion 01 Oct 2010

tekkid posted: Trojan.Zbot not being removed by RR definition like Symantec says it would

I need a solution Reference: Tracking #17622685 Attempted to removel Trojan.Zbot with RR definition dated 10/01/2010 v21 and it did not work even though the closing email for the above tracking case said it would. Ideas or

discussion comment 24 Aug 2010

tekkid commented on: August 24, 2010 r2 definition - brought computers to a crawl

Update: The error appeared to only occur on our file server which locked up the server in question along with computers connecting to it via network mapped drive.

discussion comment 24 Aug 2010

tekkid commented on: August 24, 2010 r2 definition - brought computers to a crawl

Received this error on our file server, whatever it is, it has hosed all of computers on our network: Event Type: Warning Event Source: Symantec AntiVirus Event ...

discussion comment 24 Aug 2010

tekkid commented on: August 24, 2010 r2 definition - brought computers to a crawl

It was the process of updating, computers returned to normal after the update. This typically does not occur.

New forum discussion 24 Aug 2010

tekkid posted: August 24, 2010 r2 definition - brought computers to a crawl

I need a solution The definition entitled August 24, 2010 r2 that went out today to our computers around 2:30 p.m. brought our systems down to a crawl (computers ot servers). Was there anything significant in this update? Typ

New forum discussion 28 Jun 2010

tekkid posted: IPS Updates

I need a solution I've noticed that IPS definitions have been released almost daily since last Thursday. Is there high activity that is causing Symantec to produce these more frequent updates or is this something we should

discussion comment 23 Jun 2010

tekkid commented on: XP SP2 to SP3 upgrade with SEP RU5 installed

Jason - No, this is not consistent. The Management client service startup has happened on about 4 out of 11 upgrades so far (awfully high percentage this early into it). For the C++ issue, this computer belongs to a ...

discussion comment 23 Jun 2010

tekkid commented on: XP SP2 to SP3 upgrade with SEP RU5 installed

AravindKM - We are using RU5 at both the SEPM servers and clients.

discussion comment 23 Jun 2010

tekkid commented on: XP SP2 to SP3 upgrade with SEP RU5 installed

Rafeeq - I read your link regarding Symantec Antivirus. It does not sound similar to what we are experiencing. I am really hoping I don't have to conduct a repair for each XP3 upgrade. Is there a script ...

New forum discussion 23 Jun 2010

tekkid posted: XP SP2 to SP3 upgrade with SEP RU5 installed

I need a solution We are upgrading our XP workstations to XP3 so that we can continue to receive MS security updates past July 2010. During our initial testing, we are seeing the following behavior from random XP workstations:

New forum discussion 08 Jun 2010

tekkid posted: RU5 issue on domain controllers

I need a solution We finished our migration to RU5 (servers being last) about a month ago. Today, both of our W2k3 SP2 (Vpshere 4.0) domain controller|global catalog|dns|dhcP, vmware guests locked up with 0 percent idle time fo

New forum discussion 13 May 2010

tekkid posted: Symantec Security Response Automation (Tracking #15579967)

I need a solution Submitted sample to Symantec. They say it's not infected. But...it is! Any suggestions on how to get Symantec to change their mind? Currently, the malware uses alerts through Windows Security Center

discussion comment 12 May 2010

tekkid commented on: Antivirus vulnerability in SSDT hooking

I think the main point is that the machine has to be owned already by some other piece of malware before this is likely to happen. ...Meaning you already have problems before the kernel hooking starts....

discussion comment 22 Apr 2010

tekkid commented on: McAfee Learning Experience

ShadowPapa/Brian - I like both of your arguments. Risk assessment in this situation is definitely calculated. Also testing is an interesting venture. Although, I'm not sure how much that ...

New forum discussion 22 Apr 2010

tekkid posted: McAfee Learning Experience

I need a solution I'd like to talk about what happened to McAfee customers yesterday. As you may have read in the news, they released a bad antivirus definition that had effects similiar to an Internet worm. ht

New forum discussion 31 Mar 2010

tekkid posted: Backup files and folders and problem with encryption

I need a solution I just deployed a BESR 2010 server in our environment to evaluate replacing Symantec Netbackup Desktop Agent. The newer portion of the backup ran fine (system state or something like that). However, the bac

New forum discussion 30 Mar 2010

tekkid posted: SRTSP detections

I need a solution We recently upgraded to SEP RU5 on our two SEPM servers and are about 50 percent of the way through the client upgrades. An issue that has occurred in the past with previous versions has resurfaced. Our nig

tekkid

tekkid's Activity

Technical Support

Symantec.com

Store

Community Stats