I am getting the same now. Why should WE be begging your clients to sort this out when it is YOUR po0licies doing this? Beleive me, it is YOUR police, just the smae as Outlook/Live?Hotmail. You are blanket banning emails sent from specic clusters of IP addresses because someone using the same hosting provider is spamming! You are going to destroy business with this awful software.
Let me tell you my scenariio - I am legitimately trying to email a member of staff at a large company. First, my email gets rejected so that immediately damages my reputation! Then, I'm expected to get that memebr of staff to spend their precious time trying top sort this out - of course, that member of staff has no authority to do so and so has to waste more time trying to find the right person to report this to. What are the cahnces of that hepening.
YOU can sort these messes out by changing the policies so that individual email addresses are listed as spammers and not server IPs.
So, whi should I invoice for the time, effort and loss of business caused by your indescriminate policies? mm?
My bounced email:
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
host cluster1.eu.messagelabs.com [85.158.136.67]
SMTP error from remote mail server after initial connection:
501 Connection rejected by policy [7.7] 20703, please visit www.messagelabs.com/support for more details about this error message.
------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
Return-path: <john@pagetostage.org.uk>
Received: from cpc1-live16-0-0-cust236.know.cable.virginm.net ([77.97.104.237]:57428 helo=Hal9000)
by server1.netprohost.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.85)
(envelope-from <john@pagetostage.org.uk>)
id 1ZZ039-002vC7-2B