Venkatesh,
First of all, no one in this thread has commented on the way that the file size is displayed - ie: 41,94,296Kb
This is surely an impossible format for displaying file size.
Secondly, the comment by BrycenM:
It seems upon first impression that this image is corrupted. Looking at the file sizes, something does not seem right, GSS only allows a maximum image file span of 2gb. Your images spans are 4gb each with the last one being zero.
-is demonstrably incorrect, based on the information provided.
The 2Gb limitation only applies when saving to a network share, and exists because in the old days, Ghost was unable to determine if the network file share was formatted as FAT or NTFS, and "FAT" has the 2Gb limit, so it was a case of working with the lowest common denominator. Certainly I had no problems at all saving Ghost files back in XP days on a local NTFS USB hard disk as a single massive span of 40Gb or more. Since NT supports FAT64 partitions of 4Gb in size, it is perfectly possible to have a Ghost image with 4Gb GHS files.
You have not mentioned what version of Ghost was used to generate the Ghost image, and whether the same version is being used. Also are you trying to restore from the same disk volume that was originally used to house the image when created.
Finally, what operating system are you running Ghost from? If you are booting to DOS, then it is never going to work, as DOS is limited to 2Gb files, and it would also explain why the file size formatting is displayed incorrectly. You will need to run Ghost from a 64 bit environment as this appears to be the environment used to create the image.
So you could try running Ghost from 64 bit windows and restoring the image to another disk volume, such as an external USB hard disk. Or run it from a WinPE boot environment running 64 bit WinPE.
I believe VMWare may have the capability of mounting Ghost backups - easy to check from their website I would imagine.
Anyway, until you get the filesize to display correctly, do not try restoring the images as you will risk corrupting the files and making them unuseable.
BrycenM is absolutely correct however when he says that if the images have become damaged or corrupted, you have no chance whatsoever of recovering any files. Is was never designed as a backup solution.