Hello,
I am not sure why they want to have to update these machines manually and use no Liveupdate Service?
Maybe unavailability of Internet OR probably to Reduce Bandwidth.
In such cases, Why not use the Symantec Liveupdate Administrator?
Here you would be able to update more than 20 machines in one go and that too automatically.
LiveUpdate Administrator (LUA) creates a local repository of the content and product updates available on the public LiveUpdate (LU) servers. Under the right circumstances, LUA can be used to minimize the amount of external bandwidth needed to update Symantec products in large, highly centralized networks.
The main reasons for installing LUA are:
- Testing content updates before distributing them to prdouction environments
- Reduced bandwidth utilization when updating unmanaged Symantec products
- An internal failover mechanism for updating managed Symantec products
- Consolidated management of updates for multiple Symantec products in secure environments
Check these Articles:
When to use LiveUpdate Administrator
http://www.symantec.com/docs/TECH154896
Best Practices for LiveUpdate Administrator (LUA) 2.x
http://www.symantec.com/docs/TECH93409
How to obtain the latest version of Symantec LiveUpdate Administrator (LUA) 2.x
http://www.symantec.com/docs/TECH134809
Installing and Configuring LiveUpdate Administrator (LUA)
http://www.symantec.com/docs/TECH102701
LiveUpdate Administrator 2.x and Symantec Endpoint Protection Manager on the same computer
http://www.symantec.com/docs/TECH105076
Hope that helps!!!